Addictions Community

Alcoholism Abstinence - Abstinence and Controlled Drinking

Bookmark and Share

Rychtarik et al. found that treatment aimed at abstinence or controlled drinking was not related to patients' ultimate remission type. Booth, Dale, and Ansari (1984), on the other hand, found that patients did achieve their selected goal of abstinence or controlled drinking more often. Three British groups (Elal-Lawrence, Slade, & Dewey, 1986; Heather, Rollnick, & Winton, 1983; Orford & Keddie, 1986) have found that treated alcoholics' beliefs about whether they could control their drinking and their commitment to a CD or an abstinence-treatment goal were more important in determining CD versus abstinence outcomes than were subjects' levels of alcohol dependence. Miller et al. (in press) found that more dependent drinkers were less likely to achieve CD outcomes but that desired treatment goal and whether one labeled oneself an alcoholic or not independently predicted outcome type.

Summary

Controlled drinking has an important role to play in alcoholism treatment. Controlled drinking as well as abstinence is an appropriate goal for the majority of problem drinkers who are not alcohol-dependent. In addition, while controlled drinking becomes less likely the more severe the degree of alcoholism, other factors—such as age, values, and beliefs about oneself, one's drinking, and the possibility of controlled drinking—also play a role, sometimes the dominant role, in determining successful outcome type. Finally, reduced drinking is often the focus of a harm-reduction approach, where the likely alternative is not abstinence but continued alcoholism.

(SEE ALSO: Alcohol; Disease Concept of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse; Relapse Prevention; Treatment)


Table 1. Selected Alcoholism Outcome Studies
StudyYears of
Follow-up
No. of
Assessed
Subjects
Percent
Abstinent
Percent
Controlled
Drinking
Percent
Remission
Survivors (a)
Untreated
Goodwin, Crane, & Guze (1971)893833 (b)41
1989 Canadian National Survey>=14974951100 (c)

Treated
Rand (Polich, Armor, & Braiker 1981)45482818 (d)46
Vaillant (1983)810039645
Helzer et al. (1985) (e)5-738715 (f)18 (g)33
McCabe (1986)1631263561
Nordström & Berglund (1987)18-2455203858
Rychtarik et al. (1987)5-643232144
Wallace et al. (1988)0.516968 (h)-(h)68 (h)
Finney and Moos (1991)1083542478
Walsh et al. (1991)220023 (37) (i)10 (7) (i)33 (44) (i)

a Since only survivors are included, successful remission rates are overstated.

b Nonabstinence remission included 18 percent "moderate drinkers," 9 percent getting "drunk about once a week," 6 percent "switched from whiskey to beer, . . . drank almost daily and sometimes excessively, [but] had experienced no problems from drinking since making the change."

c The Canadian National Survey data concern only recovered alcohol abusers.

d Defined as nonproblem drinking, with either low quantities of consumption (8%) or some heavy drinking (10%).

e Although all subjects in this study were hospital patients, only one group was treated in an alcohol unit. This group had the worst outcomes of any group, but these outcomes were not reported separately.

f Reported data were weighted by Helzer et al.

g Controlled drinking outcomes include occasional drinkers (4.6%), moderate drinkers (1.6%), and heavy, nonproblem drinkers (12%).

h Wallace et al. reported 57 percent continuous abstinence over 6 months and an additional 11 percent currently abstinent. Although Wallace et al. reported no controlled drinking, a small group (4%) had "one brief contained return to drinking or drug use" in the 180-day period.

i Figures are for all treated groups, with assigned hospital patients in parentheses. No controlled-drinking category was included, but this column comprises those in the study who drank without ever becoming intoxicated during the 2-year follow-up (the latter data are not fully reported in the published article).


Table 2. Controlled Drinking and Abstinence in Relation to Treated and Untreated Remission: The 1989 Canadian National Alcohol and Drug Survey
(Data Weighted to Represent National Population)
Treated Remission (n = 89)Untreated Remission (n = 408)
Abstinent (51%)9239
Nonabstinent (49%)861

Data presented by L. C. Sobell & M. B. Sobell (November 1991).
Cognitive mediators of natural recoveries from alcohol problems: Implications for treatment.
Paper presented as part of a symposium, "Therapies for Substance Abuse: A View towards the Future,"
25th Annual Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, New York.


Table 3. Relapse Rates at 4-Year Follow-up According to Remission Category at Eighteen Months, by Alcohol Dependence Category, Marital Status, and Age

Age < 40 at AdmissionAge > 40 at Admission
Abstaining
18 Months
Nonproblem
Drinking
18 Months
Abstaining
18 Months
Nonproblem
Drinking
18 Months
High Dependence Symptoms
Married
12171450
Single2172428
Low Dependence Symptoms
Married
1671928
Single2933213

J. M. Polich, D. J.. Armor, & H. B. Braiker (1981). The course of alcoholism: Four years after treatment. New York: Wiley.