All for Him: Articles About Sex in
American Lad Magazines
continued from
The finding that improving the male reader's sex life was a
prominent topic is hardly surprising, yet is nonetheless important. After
all, if lad magazines are being used as sources of sex education, what are
readers learning? First, as they read repeatedly about
how to improve their
sex life, they are likely to learn that their sex life is presently
inadequate. Otherwise, it would not need improving. Second, readers may
learn that they can improve it along fairly narrowly defined lines--lines
suggested, for example, by the next most common topics, specifically
unorthodox sexual locations and positions, and by other topics frequently
mentioned in these articles, such as use of alcohol. Ultimately, these
articles seem very clearly to emphasize an androcentric sexuality that
emphasizes sexual variety.
To understand the exception to this pattern, specifically
the phenomenon that the most common topic of articles about sex in the
sample was what women want, we must look beyond the primary topic of those
articles and explore their contents further. After all, most of those
articles also contained discussion of improving the presumably male readers'
sex life. It is possible that such mentions alter the fundamental meaning of
the articles in which they occur. Examination of examples of such articles
makes this clear. One article in Maxim titled "More Sex Now!" suggested a
number of strategies for pleasing a woman and helping her to
enjoy sex more.
These included talking dirty, giving her surprise gifts, and extending
foreplay. The initial paragraphs of the article, however, as well as the
title, signal that the male reader should engage in such behaviors in order
to increase the frequency and enthusiasm of sexual intercourse. This is
echoed throughout the article, as the author promised that the specific
behaviors presented as what women desire will result in sexual rewards for
men, as when she stated that "we'll go out of our way to express our
gratitude (read: blow job), and presto: Your sex life's back." Another
article features a discussion among six women about what makes a potential
male partner appealing and a present sex partner worth keeping; the article,
written entirely from a woman's perspective, emphasized women's wants, yet
the opening paragraph encouraged the male reader to use the article as a
"guided tour through a first encounter and beyond" in order to "make sure"
they get what they want sexually.
Thus, articles about what women want are essentially framed
in terms of improving men's sexual experiences. The message is that if you
give women what they want, then your sex life will improve. Essentially,
then, any such article is consistent with the expectation that articles
about sex in lad magazines will reinforce traditional masculine gender norms
about sex, as women's sexual experience serves as a pathway to the
fulfillment of men's sexual goals.
This is further reinforced by the frequent occurrence of
mentions of unorthodox sexual behaviors in articles about what women want.
The message of such articles is that women want to engage in unusual sexual
behaviors as much as men do, that women are driven by sexual variety just as
men are. This is exemplified by articles in which women are quoted as they
enthuse over bondage, sex in public, group sex, and the use and imitation of
pornography during sex. The implicit message is that women's and men's
sexual desires are essentially similar (for discussions of the similarities
and differences between men's and women's sexuality, see Baumeister et al.,
2001; Oliver & Hyde, 1993; Schmitt et al., 2003).
The finding that 17 articles mentioned lesbianism also, at
first glance, seems inconsistent with expectations about androcentric
messages about sex. Closer examination, however, indicates that most such
references are actually about women engaging in sex with other women while
men watch or participate. A few others consist of descriptions of sexual
encounters with women by women who claim to be bisexual which, at least in
their description in print, could be seen as essentially serving to further
men's sexual satisfaction. In short, these references are also essentially
oriented toward men's sexual outcomes.
The fact that most of the articles about sex in these
magazines are accompanied by images of women depicted suggestively or only
partially clothed may reinforce this notion. Regardless of the subject
matter of an article, it is accompanied by a sexualized image of at least
one woman. This may serve to influence the meaning readers ascribe to any
content. The images themselves may function to activate stereotypes about
women as sex objects; these stereotypes would then be expected to influence
how readers understand what they read. Articles about what women want
sexually, for example, may be understood even more in terms of men's
pleasure than would otherwise be the case.
Another unexpected outcome is more difficult to explain.
Although it was expected that information about the positivity and
negativity of various relationship states depicted as the contexts for sex
would ultimately privilege relatively uncommitted relationships, it was
found that both committed (steady or serious dating) and uncommitted
(strangers) relationships were portrayed ambivalently. This may have
important consequences for readers, though those consequences are unlikely
to be simple. Readers may learn that no relationship state is a perfect
context for sex and that there are benefits drawbacks both to having sex
with strangers and to having sex with a
committed romantic partner. They may
also learn what those respective drawbacks and benefits are, which may shape
their own sexual decisions.
Ultimately, it seems that these magazines offer little in
the way of sexual information that is different from the broad,
stereotypical perceptions of sex as androcentric and men's sexuality as
focused on variety. Even articles that seem to contradict such notions
ultimately seem to reinforce them. Of course, whether or not this
reinforcement occurs, and whether magazine articles such as those included
in the present study reinforce or change the attitudes of readers are
ultimately questions for experimental studies.
continue
Written in: 2/05. Last reviewed 11/05.
top ~
pages: 1 ~ 2 ~
3 ~ 4 ~
5 ~ 6 ~
7 ~
send page to
friend
|