The Consequences of Pornography
(September 25, 2005) --Pornography "is where hip hop was ten to fifteen
years ago," according to one Hollywood marketer -- visible, sassy and here
to stay. Watching porn together is now on Glamour magazine's "ultimate
milestones on any relationship resume."
Pornography has somehow become
interlinked with America's carnival of functionless celebrities, so that
network reality TV star Paris Hilton becomes -- in the lurid, green gaze of
a camcorder -- a porn star, while porn star Ron Jeremy is cast in the "The
Surreal Life," a cable reality TV series. In fact, swaggering by Space
Mountain or the twirling teacups on a trip to Disney World in March, Jeremy
was frequently stopped to pose for pictures with families of four, his
adoring fans.
HealthyPlace.com Video
The Future of Sex
Sex is changing and diversifying in this brave new world. Does sex have a
future?
View with
Real Player. |
|
|
But porn's pop image has nothing to do with the stuff many people are
actually watching, films such as "Gag Factor 15," a gang-banging dumb show
based on the slayings on video that came out of Iraq, which shows "Arab" men
"standing over a woman dressed in military clothes and dog tags shouting 'I
was only following orders!' " Nor does our flippancy about pornography in
public reflect the anxiety it can create in private life.
Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., told a congressional hearing on porn
addiction last fall that, when traveling, some men he knows avoid their own
hotel rooms, wary of the siren song of pay-per-view nudie flicks.
Brownback's remarks might sound like a typical Christian conniption fit
-- as might the very idea of a congressional hearing on porn addiction. But
with the political right bundling pornography with "family values" issues
like gay marriage and abortion, and the left unconcerned or even embracing
porn as a token of sexual liberation, a more serious conversation about how
porn may be quietly warping our attitudes and relationships has yet to
happen.
Pamela Paul, a frequent contributor to Time and author of "The Starter
Marriage and the Future of Matrimony," has stripped porn of its culture-war
claptrap by interviewing hundreds of people across almost every demographic.
The results are sobering. Remember the guy who, halfway through "Fast Food
Nation," pledged to stop eating meat but was back at McDonald's within days?
"Pornified" is likely to inspire similar histrionics and -- let's face it --
similar fickleness.
Paul makes it clear that to discuss porn today is to discuss Internet
porn. With its infinitely various acts, ethnicities and nipple sizes, the
Web has quickly become the so-called "crack cocaine" of smut. It's a
hassle-free delivery system heightening something that never "veers from the
automated path to pleasure" to begin with. It's amazing anyone can still
leave home and hold a job, except that people are looking at porn at their
jobs too, often openly. At Kentucky's state transportation bureau, more than
200 computers were found to access porn on a given day. And Paul discovers
one Houston oil company employee actually sidelining for an adult Web site
from his desk.
But the ease of Internet porn means, ironically, that people get bored
with it more quickly. The possibilities seem infinite, but all ultimately
unsatisfying. Tastes get "refined." (One connoisseur interviewed in "Pornified"
kvetches about "stringy inner-thigh tendons that seem to show up on a lot of
these anorexic-type models." Another says, "I'm sure I could find 50 more
interesting versions within a few keystrokes.") Then tastes skew, more
dramatically and faster than most people realize. Many men Paul speaks with
are surprised at how an innocent fetish for, say, freckles or teachers can
slip into a drive to see more abusive, degrading sex acts. An interview with
one 21-year-old begins, "At first I was just happy to see a naked woman,"
and concludes, "Recently ... I've found that I like to see a guy pissing on
a girl."
Whether or not it's OK to enjoy a tasteless or politically incorrect
fantasy is almost beside the point. Heavy porn users -- as much as 19
percent of respondents to one poll say they look at it every day -- are
effectively having more sex with these images than with other human beings.
Over time, studies and Paul's interviews show, the normalcy of what's on the
screen is taken for granted. Porn begins to cleave a troubling distance
between the porn watcher and everyone else around him. It's this
estrangement Paul laments, rather than simply a rash of kinkiness.
One man, for example, can't get off unless his girlfriend shouts at him
that she'd rather be having sex with a black man and, well, she's not so
into that. A preteen daughter discovers photos her father has taken of
himself in her underwear. "I spent a lot of time lusting after my niece,"
another man concedes.
It's not always so extreme. It turns out actual women don't always like
to have sex or talk about it the way women in porn do, and Paul finds many a
young man unwittingly alienating his girlfriend with his polished, porn-star
moves. Women may not like to yelp and moan, or coif their pubic hair just so
-- which in the bizarro world of porn is made to appear like things even the
Amish must do.
Moreover, rifling through porn is time-consuming and easy to get lost in.
Many men in "Pornified" describe -- with less guilt than regret -- hours
spent looking at porn even after the thrill is gone; "just going through the
motions," one says. They wish they'd been doing something useful. Like
corporate workaholics, here are men who spend less time with their families
than in holing up in their broadband-wired dens and getting jiggy with
Filipino schoolgirls, taking, as one put it, an attitude with their wives of
"I know you know and I don't really care."
Apparently, another of the perceptions skewed by looking at lots of porn
is that your girlfriend should be totally cool with it. Often she's not, and
that's another source of trouble. One-third of women see online porn as
cheating; only 17 percent of men do. More than half the users of one
Internet filtering software were women monitoring or blocking their
partner's Web activity, not their children's. Several lawyers tell Paul that
Internet porn is at the root of more and more divorces. One midsize Virginia
law office claims it's always got at least one such case going. But this may
not even matter, as studies show big-time porn enthusiasts are less likely
to want families in the first place, and particularly less likely to want
daughters.
With all these unsettling stories, it's almost a surprise to
find that there are cases of perfectly healthy, casual users, or those who
simply choose not to look. (One Gen-X film buff complains, "They're not
concerned about whether the Swedish plumber actually fixes the washing
machine. The outcome is always inevitable," bless his artsy heart.) Paul is
not immune to exaggeration or questionable assumptions. (Is it fair to
characterize all porn stars as victims, or to include browsing online
personals as using pornography?) Yet while there are arguments to be made, "Pornified's"
stream of anecdotes and surveys breaks important ground.
Surprise! Sen. Sam Brownback might be right -- though the situation's
more nuanced than he could ever imagine.
"Pornified" may stand as a Kinsey Report for our time, when there's
little intrigue left to be pried loose from the matrimonial bedrooms of
suburbia. People are having sex in front of their computers now, alone, and
it's time someone acknowledged that shift in a levelheaded way.
Next: Is Easily Accessible Porn A Good Thing?
Jon Mooallem has written recently for Harper's and the Nation.
Last updated: 10/05.
top ~
next ~
send page to
friend
|