A
Look at Pill Splitting
Should you cut your
antidepressant in half
to save money?
In the scramble to cut rising prices for
prescription drugs, consumers and insurers are taking a new look at an old but
controversial practice - splitting pills in half.
Purchasing large amounts of medications in high
doses and cutting them in half
saves money because bigger-dose pills of many drugs often sell for the same
price or only slightly more than smaller doses.
Consumers can purchase 30 10-milligram doses of
the antidepressant Paxil for $72.02 at Drugstore.com, for example. The site
sells the same number of 20-milligram doses for $76.80. Cost-conscious
customers can buy the larger-dose pills, split the pills in half and get twice
as much medication for $4.78 more.
Pill splitting is not without risks. Because
they may suffer from physical, mental or emotional problems, not all patients
can correctly split their
pills.
And not all pills should be split. Some must
remain intact to be absorbed properly. Others can't be split accurately because
of their shape. Even tablets with scores - those small grooves down the center
- don't always split evenly, which could result in over- and
under-dosing.
But with prescription-drug spending projected
to jump 13.5 percent this year to $161 billion, health-care plans are warming
to pill splitting as a low-tech method to curb rising drug costs.
The Veterans Affairs Department allows pill
splitting for its patients. Last week, the Illinois Medicaid program began
requiring patients who take the antidepressant Zoloft to purchase
higher-potency pills and split them in half. Since 100-milligram Zoloft tablets
cost about the same as the 50-milligram pills - $2.79 vs. $2.73 - the state
will reimburse pharmacies only for the higher dose.
The move will trim about $3 million off
Illinois' projected $1.4 billion Medicaid drug budget, said program spokeswoman
Ellen Feldhausen. Private insurers such as Kaiser Permanente, United
Healthcare, Health Net and Wellpoint Health Network also have voluntary
policies allowing doctors to permit pill splitting if patients approve.
"I think it's inevitable that health plans
will take a closer look at this. When they do so will vary and be determined by
their own needs," said Dr. Randall Stafford, a professor of medicine at
Stanford University who recently studied the cost-saving potential of pill
splitting.
The savings must be balanced against the risks
of improper dosage. A recent study of 11 commonly split tablets found that
eight, after splitting, did not meet industry guidelines for content uniformity
- between 85 percent and 115 percent of the intended dose. Even scored tablets
did not assure accurate dosages.
For these reasons, groups such as the American
Medical Association, the American Pharmaceutical Association and the American
Society of Consultant Pharmacists have opposed mandatory pill-splitting
policies by health plans.
But if the doctor, patient and pharmacist all
agree that pill splitting is workable, the practice can be safe on a voluntary
basis, said Susan Winckler, vice president for policy with the pharmaceutical
association in Washington.
Stafford's research, which tracked prescription
records on 11 drugs, found that a Massachusetts HMO with 19,000 members could
have saved nearly $260,000 a year by having its clients regularly split pills.
Savings ranged from 23 percent to 50 percent, depending on the medication,
Stafford said.
Tom Clark, director of professional affairs for
the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists, said Stafford's study
overstated the cost savings and understated the risks. He said there had been
no studies on the health of patients who split pills.
"Our position is that it's irresponsible
to promote this practice without any studies to show it's safe," Clark
said.
For years, many people have split their
regular-dosage tablets with razors, knives and pill-splitting devices to
stretch their prescriptions when they couldn't afford refills. Groups such as
the AARP frown on the practice, because patients don't get the proper
dosages.
Kaiser Permanente, an Oakland, Calif.-based
HMO, has been the industry leader in splitting higher-dose pills since it
adopted the practice on a patient-voluntary basis in the early `90s. In 1999,
Kaiser was sued over the practice; several patients and a Kaiser physician
claimed that patients were being forced to split pills. Kaiser denies the
allegation. The lawsuit is expected to go to trial next year.
Dr. Charles Phillips, an emergency-care
physician in Fresno, Calif., and a former Kaiser physician, is a plaintiff in
the lawsuit. While working for Kaiser, Phillips said, he frequently saw
patients with diabetes and hypertension whose health was harmed by inaccurately
split medications. He still opposes the practice because of the potential for
error.
"It's bad medicine," Phillips said.
"It saves money at that moment in time, but if the patient gets worse
(because of improperly split dosages) then society is losing money, because
they've got to pay for the patient's care down the line."
Kaiser officials, who have continued the
practice of pill splitting, said the Stanford study validated it.
"It confirms our view, which is that a
well-designed tablet-splitting initiative has the potential to improve
cost-effectiveness of care without impairing quality," said Tony Barrueta,
senior counsel for Kaiser. Warning: Do not make any changes in your medications or the way you take your medications without first talking it over with your doctor.
Source: Reuters Health - Sept. 29,
2002
top ~
next ~
send page to a
friend
HealthyPlace.com
Depression Center Links
home ~ site map ~
causes ~ types ~
people ~
living with
treatments ~ self-help ~ support ~ suicide ~ related
issues
|