'Technical Virginity' Becomes Part of Teens' Equation
Ten years after Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky's
relationship made oral sex a mainstream topic, there's
still plenty of debate over whether oral sex is really
sex.
"There's not only confusion; there's
fighting over it," says J. Dennis Fortenberry, a physician
who specializes in adolescent medicine at the Indiana
University School of Medicine. "People disagree fairly
vehemently."
The latest fuss is spurred by new
federal data that found that more than half of 15- to
19-year-olds have received or given oral sex. Although the
study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention did
not ask the particulars of these encounters, research
conducted in pre-Clinton times, along with more recent
studies, suggests that teens largely fall on the "it's not
sex" side. (Related story:
Teens define sex in new ways)
"Some adults say it is a form of sex,
but kids don't really see it that way," says Natalie Fuller,
19, a sophomore at Orange Coast College in Costa Mesa,
Calif.
"For most teens, the only form of sex
is penetration, and anything else doesn't count. You can
have oral sex and be a virgin."
Fuller was 16 when she, her brother
and her mother co-wrote the book
Promise You Won't Freak
Out, which includes discussion of teen oral sex.
The report released last month by the
CDC shows that one-quarter of teens who have not had
intercourse have had oral sex. The survey questions,
administered via headphones and computer for maximum
anonymity, clearly defined the actions to eliminate any
ambiguity about the meaning of the term "oral sex."
"The implications are that teens who
define themselves as abstinent may be engaging in oral sex,"
says Jennifer Manlove, a senior research associate with the
non-profit group Child Trends, which analyzed the federal
data.
Kyle Tarver, 17, a high school senior
from Pikesville, Md., who was among an informal USA TODAY
focus group of Maryland teenagers, says most teens who have
had oral sex think of themselves as virgins.
"If you were to ask someone if they
were a virgin, they wouldn't include that they had given or
gotten oral sex," he says.
A study published in 1999 in the
Journal of the American Medical Association examines the
definition of sex based on a 1991 random sample of 599
college students from 29 states. Sixty percent said
oral-genital contact did not constitute having sex. "That's
the 'technical virginity' thing that's going on," says
Stephanie Sanders, associate director of the Kinsey
Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction at
Indiana University and co-author of the study, which the
researchers titled "Would You Say You 'Had Sex' If ...?"
"There is not nearly as much
conversation between two people and as much thought put into
engaging in oral sex. That, in my mind, makes it a lot
different," says Michael Levy, 17, a senior from Owings
Mills, Md.
What constitutes sex tends to be
defined in a culture and varies with the times, Fortenberry
says.
"In certain times in the history of
the world, certain kinds of kissing would be considered
sex," he says. "Not too many years ago, a woman would have
been considered a 'loose woman' if she kissed a person
before marriage."
But a new book from the Medical
Institute for Sexual Health, an Austin-based non-profit that
has worked for abstinence education with the Bush
administration, doesn't waffle. In
Questions Kids Ask
About Sex, oral sex is clearly sex.
"Sex occurs when one person touches
another person's genitals and causes that person to get
sexually excited," the book states. "A girl or boy who's had
oral sex doesn't feel or think like a virgin anymore,
because he or she has had a form of sex."
Melissa Cox, who edited and
contributed to the book, is a Denver-based medical writer
who also edited a publication for Focus on the Family, an
organization devoted to Christian family values.
She says a medical panel for the
institute determined that oral sex is sex because it places
young people at risk for sexually transmitted diseases and
infections, puts them at risk for long-term emotional harm
and opens the door for other sexual activity.
Not everyone agrees.
"If you look at the information that
they have, you might find it difficult to cite a basis for
that, other than someone's opinion," says
adolescent-medicine specialist Fortenberry.
Teenagers say messages from the media
make them feel that casual oral sex is normal and suggest
that all teens are preoccupied with sex.
"I feel like I see more commercials
about casual sex than I do about how important it is to have
a family and how important it is to be in a marriage instead
of having sex with people from a bar," says Shanae Sheppard,
a 17-year-old senior from Owings Mills, Md.
Last week, the federal government
announced $37 million in awards to 63 programs across the
country aimed at encouraging young people to abstain from
intercourse until marriage.
But abstinence-only education may
inadvertently reinforce the belief that oral sex isn't real
sex, says John DeLamater, a sociology professor at the
University of Wisconsin and editor of the Journal of Sex
Research, a scholarly journal published by the Society
for the Scientific Study of Sexuality.
"We should be sending a message that
sexual activity is much broader," he says.
Because teens are focused on that
narrow definition of sexual intercourse and the message is
to postpone it until they are older, they tend to equate
intercourse with adulthood, Tarver says.
"Oral sex is not on a pedestal the
way that regular sexual intercourse is," he says.
Source: USA Today. Written: 10/19/05.
top ~
send page to
friend
|