The frontal placement sounds
interesting - but more interesting is my growing feeling that there is no
standardisation in the way that ECT is being given.
We used to think that it was a UK problem, but
that has largely been improved by college initiatives - ok mostly we only do
bilateral, but at least twice a week is a standard. Energy settings and
electrode types are pretty standard now, and of course basic training is
standardised too.
At an ECT training meeting (which presumably
'selected' clinicians that were at least interested in doing a good job) I met
people restimulating on the basis of single channel EEG waveforms, people who
didnt know what the 'seizure detection' line on the Thymatron meant, people
that could not EVER get a seizure with anything less than 100% energy settings
on the same machine. And that is before we started to talk about indications
for ECT and evaluating outcome or side effects.
This list gives me a similar feeling sometimes.
Im not about to say anyone is wrong (or even that I'm right) but the sheer
spread of practice across the world is most unsettling.
Carl Littlejohns
Psychiatrist N.Wales.
http://www.priory.com/psych/ectol.htm