|






SHOCKED! ECT
Site
Map
What's New
Home
About Me
Effects of ECT
ECT News
Hall of Shame
Personal ECT Stories
Forced Electroshock
Trends in ECT
Studies, Statistics, Reports
Self-Help / Alt. Depression Treatment
ECT
Bulletin Board
back to
depression community
send this page to a friend
|
|
 |
Shock Machine Company
Pays Up!
MECTA is first to pay for
brain damage
by Linda Andre, CTIP
For the first time, a product liability suit
against a shock machine manufacturer has resulted in a successful settlement
for the plaintiffs. The suit was brought by Imogene Rohovit of Iowa City, Iowa,
and her daughters, alleging that Mrs. Rohovit, a single mother and former
nurse, has been brain damaged and rendered unable to work by shocks inflicted
by the MECTA Model D machine in 1989.
MECTA Corp. and the Model D were also the
subjects of the very first product liability lawsuit against a shock machine
company in 1987. The suit claimed that MECTA's machine was designed to produce
and did routinely produce permanent memory and brain damage (not that the
machine was defective in any way). A judge initially ruled against MECTA, which
then offered a settlement of $105,000. The offer was rejected, but an appellate
judge then ruled MECTA did not have to go to trial.
No shock machine has ever been pulled off the
market, but even shock doctors now warn others not to use the powerful Model D.
It was sold in the early 1980s and many are still used. However,
self-proclaimed shock "expert" Harold Sackeim testified at trial that
he does not use the Model D on human beings, but only on research animals.
MECTA President Robin Nichol has testified that MECTA has never performed a
single safety test on its machines.
MECTA insisted on a gag order, meaning that
the exact amount of the settlement cannot be disclosed by the parties. It is
believed to be higher than the first settlement offer, but the plaintiffs
expect to see little of the money due to the high costs of bringing their case
against Mrs. Rohovit's doctors to trial. The trial lasted three weeks and the
case was lost. Mrs. Rohovit's attorney, Marc Humphrey of Des Moines, Iowa,
cites recent attempts to limit or eliminate all types of product liability
lawsuits as a factor in the settlement decision. But if these attempts fail,
the Rohovit case could encourage other suits.
( If you would like to receive
"Shockwaves," the official newsletter of CTIP and get the news you
won't find anywhere else, contact CTIP at 212-NO JOLTS ) or
join online.
top |
sitemap |
send page to a
friend
about me |
effects of ect | news
stories | personal stories
forced ect | studies-stats | hall
of shame | bulletin board
alt. depression treatment |
HealthyPlace.com
Depression Center Links
home ~ site map
|
 |
|
advertisement
|