A Primer on Depression and Bipolar Disorder
II. MOOD DISORDERS AS PHYSICAL ILLNESSES
H. Public Policy
I would like to say a few words about some reforms needed in public policy
if we are to give people with depression and bipolar disorder in particular,
and CMI people in general, a reasonable chance for adequate treatment. I am not
a sociologist or a political scientist, so I must leave it to others to devise
methods for actually accomplishing these goals.
First, there is an urgent need for some kind of adequate health insurance
for both physical and mental illnesses, available to all people at a
price they can afford. For mental illness, this system should provide all
needed services ranging from diagnosis, to talk therapy, to medication, to
hospitalization, if necessary. I know that there are those among us who will be
quick to utter the dreaded words "socialized medicine," the kiss of
death to all policies designed to help the victim instead of enrich the doctor.
So be it. I have seen "socialized medicine" at work in Europe, and I
learned that mostly it does work, particularly in Scandinavia. So long
as mental health services must be purchased by the consumer, the rich will be
adequately treated and the poor will live in misery, a gross mockery of their
equal inalienable human worth.
Whenever I visit Washington DC, I feel an intense sense of outrage when I
see the groups of shabby homeless men (mostly) clustered for survival on
sidewalk heat vents from the great white marble palaces our government likes to
house itself in. Up close, one sees that they are filthy, their clothes are
filthy and ragged, shoes even worse, and that they give every appearance of
being depressed and/or unable to connect meaningfully with reality.
Studies show that (roughly) half the group has serious problems with
alcohol or street drugs. The bulk of the others are CMI (Chronically Mentally
Ill) people who have been dropped by the existing public mental health system.
They filter down to the bottom, unable to care for themselves, and struggle
with the unrelieved misery of their illness. And I ask myself "Is
this what a 'superpower' does for its citizens? Allow them to sink to a
level of personal degradation not usually seen outside of the third world?
Dooming them to a hell from which they can hope to emerge only by dying? Would
anyone knowingly consign his/her fellow human to such a fate?"
The way I see it is that if this country is rich enough to blow away $300
billion a year to "defend" against nonexistent enemies (the Soviet
Union is no more), then it can easily afford to provide adequate health
insurance to all its citizens. Some national priorities need to change, and
soon!
A second issue is providing adequate supervision and direction to our
public mental health system at local, county, and state levels. It is well to
recall historically that when effective medications for mental illness became
available, the majority of the patients in large state and federal mental
hospitals were released on the theory (i.e. assumption) that they could now be
treated effectively on an outpatient basis at the local level.
In theory, a network of well-financed Community Mental Health Centers and
half-way houses were to be established to provide this care. Unfortunately,
there was no follow-through: federal aid was diverted to other ends, and
community-based services were left the responsibility of local governments, who
found themselves swamped by a large influx of people needing care, while having
no new source of revenue to pay the costs. In many states existing Community
Mental Health Centers tended to focus on the less serious problems (personal
adjustment, conflict management and resolution, divorce, etc.) and CMI people
found they had nowhere to turn: the local centers were unable or unwilling to
treat them, and the hospitals were closing down.
Happily, this problem has been recognized, and in the past few years a
number of states (in response to federal mandate) have given their systems a
major reorganization. In some cases, state and local chapters of NAMI have
played an important, even decisive, role in representing the interests of
people who are CMI. In those states where this process worked well, much
improved access to the system resulted for CMI people. The job is not done yet,
and everyone interested in conquering mental illness: those who are CMI,
family, friends, all of us, must continue to press for improved services
for people who are CMI at all levels of government.
top | next | table of
contents
home | about me |
depression - bipolar disorder
primer
depression and spiritual
growth | send
page to friend | bulletin board
|