ONLINE JOURNALS:

• CMC Magazine
• Cybersociology
• CyberPsychology and Behavior
• HIT Lab Publications
• Interpersonal Computing and Technology Journal
• International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
• Journal Of MUD Research
• Telehealth Magazine

INTERNET ADDICTION ARTICLES NOT AVAILABLE ONLINE:

Brady, K. (April 21, 1996). "Dropouts rise a net result of computers." The Buffalo Evening News, pg. 1.

Busch, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 147-158.

Griffiths, M. (1996). Technological addictions. Clinical Psychology Forum,161-162.

Griffiths, M. (1997). Does Internet and computer addiction exist? Some case study evidence. Paper presented at the 105th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, August 15, 1997. Chicago, IL.

Morahan-Martin, J. (1997). Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use. Paper presented at the 105th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, August 18, 1997. Chicago, IL.

Neuborne, E. (April 16, 1997). "Bosses worry Net access will cut productivity," USA Today, p. 4B.

Quittner, J. (April 14, 1997). "Divorce Internet style." Time, pg. 72

Robert Half International, Inc. (October 20, 1996). Misuse of the Internet may hamper productivity. Report from an internal study conducted by a private marketing research group.

Scherer, K. (1997). College life on-line: Healthy and unhealthy Internet use. Journal of College Student Development. 38, 655-665.

Shotton, M. (1991). The costs and benefits of "computer addiction." Behaviour and Information Technology, 10, 219-230.

ARTICLES ABOUT ONLINE RESEARCH METHODS:

Binik, Y., Mah K; & Kiesler S. (1999) Ethical issues in conducting sex research on the  Internet.  Journal of Sex Research, V36, N, 82-90

Booth-Kewley, S., Edwards, J.E., & Rosenfeld, P. (1992). Impression management, social desirability, and computer administration of attitude questionnaires: Does the computer make a difference? Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 562-566.

Burke, M.J., & Normand, J. (1987). Computerized psychological testing: Overview and critique. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 42-51.

Fawcett, J., & Buhle, E.  (1995). Using the Internet for data-collection: An innovative electronic strategy. Computers in Nursing, 13(6), 273-9.

Federico, P. (1992). Assessing semantic knowledge using computer-based and paper-based media. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 169-181.

Gaydosh, C.N. (1996). Using the internet for triple-blind psychological research studies. Paper presented at the 1996 Society for Computers in Psychology Conference. Chicago, IL.

George, C.E., Lankford, J.S., & Wilson, S.E. (1992). The effects of computerized versus paper-and-pencil administration on measures of negative affect. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 203-209.

Gressard, C.P, & Loyd, B.H. (1986). The nature and correlates of computer anxiety in college students. Journal of Human Behavior & Learning, 3, 28-33.

Hewson, C.M., Laurent, D., & Vogel, C.M. (1996). Proper methodologies for psychological and sociological studies conducted via the internet. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 186-191.

Jones, S. G. (1999) Doing Internet  research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net. Thousand Oaks, CA:  Sage Publications, Inc.

Kieley, J.M. (1996). CGI scripts: Gateways to world-wide-web power. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 165-169.

King, S.A. (1996). Researching Internet Communities: Proposed Ethical Guidelines for the Reporting of Results. The Information Society, 12, 119-127.

Koson, D. Kitchen, C. Kochen, M. & Stodolosky, D. (1970). Psychological testing by computer: Effect on response bias. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 30, 803-810. Abstract from: PsycINFO Journal Article: 46-02084

Krantz, J.H., Ballard, J., & Scher, J. (in press). Comparing the results of laboratory and world wide web samples on the determinants of female attractiveness. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers.

Liefeld, J.P. (1988). Response effects in computer-administered questioning. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 405-409. Abstract from: PsycINFO Journal Article: 76-13965

Makulowich, J.S. Labs online: research on the Internet. Environmental Health Perspectives, 103(2), 148-50 1995.

Mazzeo, J. & Harvey, A.L. (1988). The equivalence of scores from automated and conventional educational and psychological tests: A review of the literature  (College Board Rep. No. 88-8). Abstract from: ERIC database Accession Number: ED304462

Mead, A.D., & Drasgow, F. (1993). Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability test: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114,449-458.

Mehta, R., & Sivadas, E. (1995). Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society,37, 429-439.

Moreland, K. L. (1985). Computer-assisted psychological assessment in 1986: A practical guide. Special Issue: Computer assessment and interpretation:  Prospects, promise and pitfalls. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 221-233.  Abstract from: PsycINFO Journal Article: 75-00082

Reips, U. (1995a). AAAbacus, the first cognitive learning experiment on the WWW. [WWW document] URL http://134.2.133.25/WWWExpE.html

Reips, U. (1996). Experimenting in the world wide web. Paper presented at the 1996 Society for Computers in Psychology Conference. Chicago, IL.

Sampson, J.P. (1983). Computer-assisted testing and assessment: Current status and implications for the future. Measurement & Evaluation in Guidance, 15, 293-299. Abstract from: PsycINFO Journal Article: 70-09278

Sampson, J. P., Jr., Kolodinsky, R. W., & Greeno, B. P. (1997). Counseling on the information highway: Future possibilities and potential problems. Journal of Counseling and Development, 75, 203-212.

Schmidt, W.C. (in press). World wide web survey research: Benefits, Potential Problems, and Solutions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers.

Skinner, H.A. & Allen, B.A. (1983). Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face-to-face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug, and tobacco use. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 51, 267-275. Abstract from: PsycINFO Journal Article: 70-01897

Smith, M.A. (in press). Virtual subjects: Using the internet as an alternative source of subjects and research environment. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers.  Smith. M.A. & Leigh, B. (1996). Using the world wide web to institute a distributed, on-line participant pool. Paper presented at the 1996 Society for Computers in Psychology Conference. Chicago, IL.

Stern, S.E. & Faber, J.E. (1996). The lost email method: Milgram's lost letter technique in the age of the internet. Paper presented at the 1996 Society for Computers in Psychology Conference. Chicago, IL.

Thomas, J. (Ed.). (1996). The Ethics of Cyberspace Research [Special Issue].  The Information Society, 12(2).

Walsh, J.P., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L.S., & Hesse, B.W. (1992). Self-selected and randomly selected respondents in a computer network survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 241-244.

Waskul, D. & Douglass, M. (1996). Considering the Electronic Participant: Some Polemical Observations on the Ethics of On-Line Research. The Information Society, 12, 129-139.

Webster, J., & Compeau, D. (1996). Computer-assisted versus paper-and-pencil administration of questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 567-576.

top | next 

home | about us | articles | tests | cyberwidows | virtual clinic | resources
books | send page