AstraZeneca Faces
10,000 Lawsiuits Over Seroquel Drug
(February 13, 2007) -- AstraZeneca Plc, the U.K.'s second- largest
drugmaker, has been sued by almost 10,000 people in the U.S. over claimed
injuries from defects in the company's
antipsychotic drug
Seroquel, according to a court filing.
Patients claim in their complaints that AstraZeneca didn't adequately
warn of possible side effects, including severe weight gain and risk of
diabetes. Many of the suits contend the London- based company and its
affiliates promoted the drug for unapproved uses, contrary to U.S. Food and
Drug Administration regulations.
The lawsuits are similar to claims filed over injuries from the
antipsychotic drug
Zyprexa against Eli Lilly & Co., which has settled more than 28,000
cases for as much as $1.2 billion. The Lilly settlements may have set off
many of the Seroquel lawsuits, said law professor Howard Erichson.
``The fact that Zyprexa litigation resulted in a massive settlement has
to draw the attention of plaintiffs' lawyers and plaintiffs themselves,''
said Erichson, a professor at Seton Hall Law School in Newark, New Jersey.
``Mass torts litigation will develop over a particular product and then
develop over similar products.''
AstraZeneca said in a preliminary annual report filed Feb. 1 that it knew
of about 1,200 lawsuits containing the claims of about 8,000 plaintiffs. The
company ``has not determined how many additional cases, if any, may have
been filed,'' AstraZeneca said in the filing. The company said in May it
faced 232 Seroquel suits, including those with multiple claims.
Seroquel Sales
Seroquel's worldwide sales increased 24 percent in 2006 to $3.4 billion,
up from $2.75 billion in 2005. Seroquel, AstraZeneca's second-largest
selling product behind the ulcer treatment Nexium, had become the 16th
best-selling drug in the world by the third quarter of 2006, according to
data compiled by Bloomberg.
There are no defects in Seroquel, and AstraZeneca doesn't intend to
settle the suits, company spokesman Jim Minnick said.
``We are vigorously defending them all,'' he said in an interview. ``We
believe Seroquel is safe and effective.''
AstraZeneca may settle even though it believes the cases have no merit,
said analyst Max Herrmann of ING Financial Markets in London. ``You'd rather
not settle, but it's not the biggest issue they're facing.''
Those suing are seeking actual and punitive damages and disgorgement of
profits from the drug, their complaints said.
The patients suing haven't provided evidence of injuries, Minnick said.
``In most cases, there is little or no factual information regarding the
alleged injury,'' he said.
A settlement of as much as $500 million wouldn't harm AstraZeneca
financially, because it would be ``a one-off charge,'' Herrmann said.
A New Drug
Seroquel, approved for use for
schizophrenia and
bipolar disorder,
is part of a class of newer antipsychotic drugs including Zyprexa and
Johnson & Johnson's Risperdal. Seroquel passed Zyprexa last year as the
top-selling
atypical antipsychotic, Minnick said.
AstraZeneca has been sued by 9,956 individuals in U.S. courts over
Seroquel, according to a Feb. 5 filing in federal court Orlando, Florida,
where the lawsuits have been consolidated in a multidistrict litigation for
evidence-gathering and pre- trial hearings.
This includes claims by 7,171 plaintiffs in federal courts, primarily.
The claims are made in about 1,500 lawsuits, many of which have multiple
plaintiffs.
The suits claim that AstraZeneca knew the risks of Seroquel and didn't
warn patients in the U.S. ``until they were finally forced to do so by the
FDA,'' according to a complaint filed in federal court in Massachusetts, on
behalf of 997 plaintiffs.
`Aggressive Marketing'
The growth in sales of the drug, from $66 million in 1998 to $2.75
billion in 2005, was spurred by ``AstraZeneca's aggressive marketing of
Seroquel,'' according to these patients, whose cases have been transferred
to federal court in Orlando.
The marketing ``consisted chiefly of overstating the drug's uses and
benefits (including massive off-label promotion), while understating and
consciously concealing its life-threatening side effects,'' their complaint
said.
Lawyers representing Seroquel users have agreed to limit the claims filed
to people who said they developed serious health problems after taking the
drug, said attorney Paul Pennock, lead plaintiffs' counsel in the
multi-district litigation.
``Everybody involved took a blood oath that we were only going to pursue
cases where there was a real injury, like pancreatitis, diabetes or severe
exacerbation of existing diabetes,'' said Pennock of Weitz & Luxenberg in
New York. ``This was as opposed to the Zyprexa litigation where a lot of
people took on all comers,'' he said.
Pennock represents more than 1,700 plaintiffs, about 67 percent of whom
were prescribed the medication for off-label uses, including insomnia,
depression,
anxiety,
post-traumatic stress disorder and
Alzheimer's, he said.
Astrazeneca American depositary receipts, each representing one share, rose
14 cents to $56.93. Earlier, shares of the company rose 11 pence to 2,932
pence in London.
The federal lawsuits against AstraZeneca are consolidated as In re
Seroquel Products Liability Litigation, MDL-1769, U.S. District Court,
Middle District of Florida (Orlando).
Source: Bloomberg
Last updated: 02/07
top ~
news table of contents ~
send page to a
friend
|