Relationships Between Men's and
Women's Body Image and Their Psychological, Social, and Sexual Functioning
continued from
The present study was designed to investigate systematically
the role of body image in the lives of men and women throughout adulthood. A
cross-sectional design was employed, due to the practicalities of obtaining
a sample large enough to consider body image separately among men and women
of different age groups. The lack of previous research in this area supports
the contribution made by exploratory designs of this kind. Multiple measures
of body image, including evaluative, investment, and social aspects, were
compared, in order to determine which aspects of body image were most
strongly predictive of psychological (i.e., self-esteem,
depression,
anxiety), social (i.e., relations with members of the same and other sex,
social anxiety), and sexual (i.e., sexual optimism, sexual self-efficacy,
sexual satisfaction) functioning. It was hypothesized that negative body
image would be associated with poor functioning in these areas. Stronger
relationships between body image and psychological, social, and sexual
functioning were expected for women, and for younger participants, given the
emphasis in the literature on the importance of body image for these groups.
METHOD
Participants
HealthyPlace.com Audio
Women and Sexual Desire
A low
sex drive in women has been linked to hormones, and is often diagnosed
as a dysfunction. But what are the external factors that influence
sexual desire? What about stress, lack of self-esteem, or the
relationship a woman is in?Author of the book Reclaiming Your Sexual
Self, Kathryn Hall Ph.D., is the guest.
Listen with
Real Player. |
|
|
The participants were 211 men and 226 women, who ranged in
age from 18 to 86 years (M = 42.26 years, SD = 17.11). This age range was
divided into three groups, and each participant was assigned to one of the
following age groups: young adulthood, 18-29 years (n = 129), middle
adulthood, 30-49 years (n = 153), and late adulthood, 50-86 years (n = 145).
This division was carried out to create equal groups to meet the
requirements of parametric statistical analyses. Reported occupations and
postal addresses suggest that participants represented a wide range of
socioeconomic backgrounds from metropolitan and rural areas. Over 80% of
participants indicated they were originally from Australia; the remainder
were predominantly from Western European countries. Nearly all (95.78%)
participants identified themselves as heterosexual, and over 70% were in
current relationships. The weight and height of the sample corresponded well
with national Australian data for men and women (Australian Bureau of
Statistics, 1998). These data are documented for men and women, and each age
group separately in Table I.
Materials
Body Image Measures
Participants completed two subscales from the Body Image and
Body Change Questionnaire (Ricciardelli & McCabe, 2001) that are related to
Body Image Satisfaction and Body Image Importance. Each scale contained 10
items. An example item of body image satisfaction is "How satisfied are you
with your weight?," and an example item of body image importance is "How
important to you is the shape of your body, compared to other things in your
life?" Responses were on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 = extremely
dissatisfied/unimportant to 5 = extremely satisfied/important. Scores on
each scale ranged from 10 to 50; a high score represents a high level of
satisfaction with the body or a rating of appearance as highly important.
These scales emerged from both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis,
and they have demonstrated high levels of internal consistency, satisfactory
test-retest reliability, and concurrent and discriminant validity in
previous studies with adolescents (Ricciardelli & McCabe, 2001). In the
present sample, internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha) for each scale was
high among both women and men ([alpha] > .90).
Participants rated their physical attractiveness using a
scale specifically designed for this study, the Physical Attractiveness
Scale, which measures how attractive they perceived themselves, for example,
in terms of general appearance, facial attractiveness, and sexual
attractiveness. This scale contains six items, an example of which is
"Compared to other men, I am ..." Participants responded on a 5-point Likert
scale from 1 = extremely unattractive to 5 = extremely attractive. Scores
ranged from 6 to 30; a high score indicates a high self-rating of
attractiveness. Internal reliability was high among both men and women
([alpha] > .90).
HealthyPlace.com Audio
Boys
and Body Image
The pressures on girls to be thin are
well known, but do boys feel the pressure too when it comes
to shaping up?
Listen with
Real Player. |
|
|
Two body image behaviors, body concealment (the tendency to
conceal one's body from the gaze of others and to avoid discussion about
body size and shape) and body improvement (engagement in attempts to improve
one's body), were assessed using an instrument constructed for this study,
the Body Image Behavior Scales. Items were derived in part from two extant
instruments, the Body Image Avoidance Questionnaire (Rosen, Srebnik,
Saltzberg, & Wendt, 1991) and the Attention to Body Shape Scale (Beebe,
1995), which were selected through exploratory and confirmatory factor
analysis. The Body Concealment Scale consists of five items, an example item
of which is "I avoid wearing 'revealing' clothes, like shorts or bathing
suits." The Body Improvement Scale consists of three items, an example of
which is "I exercise in order to get a better body." Participants responded
on a 6-point Likert scale from 1 = never to 6 = always. Scores on the body
concealment scale ranged from 5 to 30; a high score indicates a high
engagement in attempts to conceal the body. Scores on the body improvement
scale ranged from 3 to 18; a high score indicates a high engagement in
attempts to improve the body. Internal reliability for each scale was high
among both men and women ([alpha] > .80).
Concern about others evaluating one's body was assessed
using the Social Physique Anxiety Scale (Hart et al., 1989). This scale
contains 12 items, an example of which is "In the presence of others, I feel
apprehensive about my physique/figure." Following the recommendation of
Eklund, Kelley, and Wilson (1997), item 2 was modified (to improve
performance) to "I worry about wearing clothes that might make me look too
thin or overweight." Participants rated how true each of the items were
using a 5-point Likert scale, from 1 = not at all true to 5 = extremely
true. Scores ranged from 12 to 60; a high score indicates a high level of
concern about others evaluating one's body (the responses to some items were
reverse scored). Internal and test-retest reliability have been found to be
adequate with a number of adult samples (Hart et al., 1989; Martin, Rejeski,
Leary, McAuley, & Bane, 1997; Motl & Conroy, 2000; Petrie, Diehl, Rogers, &
Johnson, 1996). Internal reliability was high among both men and women in
the present sample ([alpha] > .80).
Participants indicated their level of appearance comparison
by completing the Physical Appearance Comparison Scale (Thompson et al.,
1991). This scale contains five items, an example of which is "At parties or
other social events, I compare my physical appearance to the physical
appearance of others." Responses were made on a 5-point Likert scale, from 1
= never to 5 = always. Scores ranged from 5 to 25; a high score indicates a
strong tendency to compare one's own appearance with that of others.
Although psychometric characteristics were found to be adequate with a
university sample (Thompson et al., 1991), item 4 correlated with others at
a low level in the present community sample (squared multiple correlation
<.05). Therefore, this item was excluded from the composite variable, which
resulted in an acceptable level of internal reliability among men ([alpha] >
.70) and women ([alpha] > .80).
Psychological Functioning Measures
Participants completed the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
(Rosenberg, 1965). This scale contains 10 items, an example of which is "I
feel that I have a number of good qualities." Responses were made on a
4-point Likert scale, from 1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree.
Scores ranged from 4 to 40; a high score indicates high self-esteem (the
responses to some items were reverse scored). This instrument has been
widely used in research, and has demonstrated good psychometric properties
(Rosenberg, 1979). Internal reliability was high among both men and women in
the present sample ([alpha] > .80).
continue
top ~
pages: 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 ~
send page to a
friend
|