Decoding
Schizophrenia
continued from
Theories focusing largely on dopamine are problematic on additional grounds.
Improper dopamine balance cannot account for why one individual with
schizophrenia responds almost completely to treatment, whereas someone else
shows no apparent response. Nor can it explain why positive symptoms respond so
much better than negative or cognitive ones do. Finally, despite decades of
research, investigations of dopamine have yet to uncover a smoking gun. Neither
the enzymes that produce this neurotransmitter nor the receptors to which it
binds appear sufficiently altered to account for the panoply of observed
symptoms.
The Angel Dust Connection
If dopamine cannot account well for schizophrenia, what is the missing link?
A critical clue came from the effects of another abused drug: PCP
(phencyclidine), also known as angel dust. In contrast to amphetamine, which
mimics only the positive symptoms of the disease, PCP induces symptoms that
resemble the full range of schizophrenia's manifestations: negative and
cognitive and, at times, positive. These effects are seen not just in abusers
of PCP but also in individuals given brief, low doses of PCP or ketamine (an
anesthetic with similar effects) in controlled drug-challenge trials.
Such studies first drew parallels between the effects of PCP and the
symptoms of schizophrenia in the
1960s. They showed, for example, that individuals receiving PCP exhibited the
same type of disturbances in interpreting proverbs as those with schizophrenia.
More recent studies with ketamine have produced even more compelling
similarities. Notably, during ketamine challenge, normal individuals develop
difficulty thinking abstractly, learning new information, shifting strategies
or placing information in temporary storage. They show a general motor slowing
and reduction in speech output just like that seen in schizophrenia.
Individuals given PCP or ketamine also grow withdrawn, sometimes even mute;
when they talk, they speak tangentially and concretely. PCP and ketamine rarely
induce schizophrenialike hallucinations in normal volunteers, but they
exacerbate these disturbances in those who already have schizophrenia.
One example of the research implicating NMDA receptors in schizophrenia
relates to the way the brain normally processes information. Beyond
strengthening connections between neurons, NMDA receptors amplify neural
signals, much as transistors in old-style radios boosted weak radio signals
into strong sounds. By selectively amplifying key neural signals, these
receptors help the brain respond to some messages and ignore others, thereby
facilitating mental focus and attention. Ordinarily, people respond more
intensely to sounds presented infrequently than to those presented frequently
and to sounds heard while listening than to sounds they make themselves while
speaking. But people with schizophrenia do not respond this way, which implies
that their brain circuits reliant on NMDA receptors are out of kilter.
If reduced NMDA receptor activity prompts schizophrenia's symptoms, what
then causes this reduction? The answer remains unclear. Some reports show that
people with schizophrenia have fewer NMDA receptors, although the genes that
give rise to the receptors appear unaffected. If NMDA receptors are intact and
present in proper amounts, perhaps the problem lies with a flaw in glutamate
release or with a buildup of compounds that disrupt NMDA activity.
continued ~ pages 1
2 3
4 5
new schizophrenia drugs in development
~ steep social costs of
schizophrenia
top ~ articles table of contents
home
~ overview ~ comprehensive
info
meds ~
news stories ~
articles ~
bulletin board
|