Psychological Intimacy in the Lasting Relationships of Heterosexual and Same-Gender Couples
continued from
HealthyPlace.com Audio
The
Science of Love
For the first time, researchers have located the place in the brain where those
love-struck fevered feelings take root. The neural profile when you fall madly
in love is similar to the profile when you feel thirst, hunger or when you crave
a drug. And where the passionate romance "hot spot" is on the right side of the
brain, sexual desire is on the left. Hear about the latest research on
understanding the biology of falling into love.
Listen with
windows media player. |
|
|
The Significance of Psychological Intimacy to Well-Being
Apart from its heuristic value in understanding
loving relationships,
psychological intimacy is important to an individual's well-being. Prager
(1995) summarized the research on the positive effects of being involved in
psychologically intimate relationships. Citing several investigations by
college students of Nazi Holocaust survivors, Prager argued for the benefits
to well-being: individuals are able to share their thoughts and feelings
about stressful events and receive support by someone who cares. Openness
within a meaningful relationship has been found to reduce stress, enhance
self-esteem and -respect, and reduce symptoms of physical and psychological
impairment. Conversely, studies of isolated individuals unable to engage in
relationships that promote openness and disclosure of inner thoughts and
feelings are at risk for developing physical and psychological symptoms.
Drawing from several studies, Prager concluded that "even people with
sizable social networks are likely to develop symptoms of psycho logical
disturbance in the face of stressful events if they lack confiding
relationships." (pp. 2-3).
A THEORETICAL FRAME WORK
Our efforts to identify components of psychologically intimacy in a
relationship underscored the complexity of the concept and the importance of
being as precise as possible in developing an operational definition of it
in our research. The definition that was developed (see Method section) was
framed within the context of other contiguous dimensions of these
relationships (e.g., equity, decision-making, and conflict-management
styles).
In this framework, psychological intimacy referred to the meaning
associated with relational experiences, as reported in participants'
interviews. Operationally, psychological intimacy was defined as the sense
that one could be open and honest in discussing with a partner
personal
thoughts and feelings not usually expressed in other relationships. This
concept of intimacy is different from actual observations of verbal and
nonverbal interactions, which may contribute (or not contribute) over time
to an inner sense of being psychologically intimate in relationships. The
focus of our research was on inner psychological themes (i.e., schemas of
intimacy) as reported by participants, which were assumed to be contingent
on the quality of specific relational experiences between partners.
Based on our review of the literature on the meaning and experience of
psychological intimacy, we suggest that any approach to understanding this
important dimension of relationships must consider four interrelated
components: proximity, openness, reciprocity, and interdependence of
partners. These elements must be assessed at different points over the
life-span of individuals and within the context of culture. For example,
these components may have a different significance for older couples who
have been together for many years, such as those in this study, compared to
couples who are at the beginning of a loving relationship. The meaning and
expression of psychologically intimate communication may also vary between
ethnic and racial groups, males and females, and partners in heterosexual
and same-gender relationships. Given the potential connections between
physical and psychological well-being, the quality of relationships and the
demographic reality of an aging population, research into psychological inti
macy among a diverse group of older heterosexual and same-gender couples is
timely.
METHOD
A semistructured interview format was developed and pretested by the
researchers. The resulting interview guide consists of focal questions that
were designed to elicit how participants viewed several dimensions of their
relationships. Collaborative researchers conducted additional pilot testing
and provided feedback that led to further refinement of the interview guide.
The guide, which was used in all interviews, was divided into four
sections: the participant's relationship; social influences, including
economic and cultural factors; the relationships of the parents (all
participants had been reared by heterosexual parents); and experiences of
participants and views of their relationships from the early to recent
years. The "recent years," the focus of this paper, can be categorized as
the last 5 to 10 years prior to the interviews. The "early years" are the
years prior to the birth of the first child for couples who had children, or
the first 5 years for those without children or who adopted children after
being together for 5 years.
HealthyPlace.com Video
Practicing Responsible Sex
Sexual contact can sometimes result in problems. An unwanted pregnancy or
sexually transmitted diseases may be some of those consequences. But by
practicing safe sex, being monogamous or abstaining, the risks of these
difficulties are greatly reduced.
View with
windows media player. |
|
|
The interview structure was designed to acquire in-depth information from
the point of view of individual participants, to develop an understanding of
how each partner adapted over the life span of their relationships. An
open-ended style of interviewing allowed for freedom of expression, to
elicit information from the perspectives of participants about interactions
with partners. The approach, which adapted clinical interviewing skills to
the needs of the research, explored the experiences of individuals within
relationships as they remembered and reported them.
The interviewers, advanced doctoral students with extensive clinical
experience, were trained in the use of the interview guide. They were
respectful and accepting of the uniqueness of each participant's
perceptions. Their empathic interviewing skills were a valuable resource in
collecting the data (Hill, Thomson & Williams, 1997).
The interviews were held in the participants' homes, which provided
additional information about lifestyles and environments. Prior to each
interview, participants were told about the purpose of the study, given an
overview of the interview schedule, and assured their identities would
remain anonymous. Informed consent for audiotaping and the use of interviews
for research were obtained. Each partner was interviewed separately; the
length of each of the interviews was approximately 2 hours.
Sample
Couples were recruited through business, professional, and trade union
organizations, as well as through churches, synagogues, and a variety of
other community organizations. Most couples resided in the northeast part of
the country.
The sample was chosen purposively to fit with the goal of developing an
understanding of a diverse and older group of heterosexual and same-gender
couples in lasting relationships. Couples were recruited who met the
following criteria:
1. They were married or in a committed same-gender relationship for
at least 15 years.
2. They were diverse in race/ethnicity, education, religious
background, and sexual orientation.
Of the 216 partners who were interviewed, 76% were white and 24% were
people of color (African-Americans and Mexican-Americans). The religious
background of the couples was as follows: 46% were Protestant; 34% were
Catholic; and 20% were Jewish. Fifty-six percent were college graduates and
44% were non-college graduates. The mean age for the sample was 57 years (SD
= 10.24): 27% of participants were in their 40s, 33% in their 50s, 26% in
their 60s, and 14% in their 70s. Sixty-seven percent of couples were
heterosexual and 33% in same-gender relationships. The mean number of years
shared together was 30.22 (SD = 10.28): 18% of couples had been together 40
years or longer; 29% between 30 and 39 years; 34% between 20 and 29 years;
and 19% less than 20, but more than 15 years. Seventy-seven percent of the
couples had children; 23% did not have children. By total gross family
income, 7% of couples earned less than $25,000; 25% between $25,000 and
$49,999; 29% between $50,000 and $74,999; and 39% had gross incomes of
$75,000 or more.
Coding
Each interview was tape-recorded and transcribed to facilitate
coding and prepare the data for both quantitative and qualitative analysis.
Interview passages were coded for relational themes, which were then
developed into categories (Strauss & Corbin, 1990).
Initially, a research team (two women, two men) coded eight
transcriptions blindly and individually. Detailed notes were kept and
categories were generated. A relationship coding sheet was developed and
used in subsequent coding of eight additional interviews. As new categories
arose, previous interviews were recoded in keeping with the constant
comparative process. Having both genders involved in that process helped
control for gender bias and contributed to the development of a shared
conceptual analysis. A scoring system was developed to identify themes that
evolved from each section of the interviews. There were over 90 categories
in 24 topic areas for every participant.
continue
top ~
pages 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8 ~
send page to
friend
|