| ...______________sexpolice
Both the scientific and social interpretations are increasingly complicated
and controversial. The International Olympic Committee has found itself at the
center of the uncertainty. The first shock came when Hermann Ratjen, who ran as
Dora Ratjen for Germany in the 1930s, confessed in 1957 that he had disguised
himself at the request of the Nazi Youth Movement. So in 1966, as the
opportunities for women to compete expanded rapidly, a panel of judges began
checking female athletes for vaginal openings, overlarge clitorises, a penis or
testicles. By 1968, chromosome testing replaced these "nude parades,"
and in 1992, a more sophisticated instrument to hunt for the SRY gene was
adopted. But as the technology advanced, so did the confusion.
Five women out of 2,406 tested "male" in the 1992 Barcelona
Olympics. Eight women in the 1996 Atlanta games didn't pass as females. In
February, the Athletes' Commission of the International Olympics Committee
urged its parent organization to do away with sex analysis entirely and rely
instead on observed urination during drug testing to pinpoint any likely
imposters.
Anatomy, gonads, hormones, genes, rearing, identity and even the
presumptions of others all play into a person's sex. "To select only one,
the genetic sex, out of a large number of sex-determining factors and analyze
for that one is scientifically incorrect," says Arne Ljungqvist, head of
the International Amateur Athletics Federation doping commission.
Both women and men in sports have begun to accept a broader definition of
what a "woman" is, accepting those with chromosomal variations and
sometimes even testes. Intersex activists hope pediatric specialists also will
quit worrying about what those jock straps contain -- and indeed, some already
have.
William Reiner, who started out as a urologic surgeon, went back to school
after witnessing the misery of children living with the results of
sex-correction surgery. Now a child psychiatrist at Johns Hopkins University,
he says the most important sex organ is the brain. Reiner doesn't buy any
theories about a range in biological sex; in fact he thinks it's quite binary.
All the more reason to step back from aggressive enforcement, he says. Sure, go
ahead and assign sex at birth, he suggests, but in the final analysis boys will
be boys, girls will be girls, and they know what they are better than any
parent or doctor.
Some surgeries are medically necessary, and many seem to turn out just fine.
Reiner hopes to sort out some of the mysteries by following the lives of 700
children born with atypical genitals, 40 of whom had their sex reassigned at
birth. "The kids are going to tell us the answers," he says. Cheryl
Chase thinks she knows some already. She founded the network that grew into the
Intersex Society of North America, a clan of 1,400 whose anatomy doesn't fit
the binary ideal. Born with both ovarian and testicular tissue, Cheryl started
out life as Charlie. But doctors decided later that since she was potentially
fertile and had a short penis, she'd be better off as a girl. Her parents
changed her name, threw away photographs and birthday cards and had her
clitoris removed when she was 18 months old. Her ovotestis came out at age 8.
She was in her 20s and living as a lesbian in the 1970s when she dug up the
truth about her birth and life as a boy -- making her feel like an imposter in
her own community. And for her, like many others who had surgery on their
genitals, the missing parts and scarring made sex more likely to bring pain
than pleasure.
The Intersex Society doesn't oppose assigning gender at birth. Instead it --
and now some medical specialists -- urges parents and doctors to refrain from
surgery and be open to a change in sex identity later.
But Chase, for one, isn't waiting for culture to come to terms with biology.
"I'm focused on practical changes that come quickly, not pie in the
sky," Chase says. "I would much rather keep my clitoris and have
orgasms than have a box to check off."
Helena Harmon-Smith, Patrick's mother, says she wants children like her son
to be allowed their own decisions -- and more than anything, to be recognized
as real. "My son was one of the lucky few -- because he is technically
both. He can be boy or girl," she says. She will never forgive Patrick's
doctor for making the choice for him.
Sex police | page
1, 2, 3
top
home
~ about me
~ intersexuality
faq ~ intersexuality vocabulary
~ articles
real people ~
bulletin board
~
|