Group Therapy for Eating Disorders
continued
OPEN OR CLOSED
HealthyPlace.com
Video

Anorexia:
One Person's Story In her early twenties -
Isabelle suffered from anorexia. It was a real shock to her
because she thought it was something that only happened to
teenagers. She believes it's important to be open about
eating disorders - because so many people suffer from them
in private. She also believes it's important for sufferers
to find something they enjoy doing - so they have something
positive in their lives to keep them going. Isabelle's
lifeline was dancing.
View with
Real Player.
|
|
|
A group can be short term and closed, allowing no other patients in, or
long term, allowing or not allowing others to join throughout the group's
existence. These judgments are made depending on factors such as the
therapist's philosophy, the patient population, finances, and the group
setting. For example, a group in a hospital will generally be ongoing and
accept new members whenever there is a new hospital admission. A group run
by a therapist in private practice might have eight specific members and
last a year or more. Often, groups in private practice are started and then
the group itself decides what type of group it wants to be. For example,
group participants can make a commitment for six months, agreeing to take a
certain number of new members, or they can commit and pay for four weeks at
a time and reevaluate after each four-week period. It is important for some
pledge to be made to establish a working group where all members have the
same commitment and expectations. The group commitment helps separate a
therapy group from a support group.
SUPPORT GROUP
A support group is usually a "drop-in" group where new people can come in
at any time. An Overeaters Anonymous meeting or ANAD group, where the participants may vary greatly from one group to the
next, is an example of a support group. The nature of this kind of group
with varying members does not allow for continuity or for the same kind of
intimacy and depth as a therapy group. Support groups are usually free and
are set up to provide support and education to members, not to provide
therapy. Support groups are valuable and have their place, but they are
different than a group run by a therapist where the members are committed to
coming for a certain period of time.
FORMING THE GROUP
PLACE, TIME, SIZE
The therapist or facilitator, with or without group input, must
ultimately determine where the group will meet, for how long it will meet,
and how many members to include. A common format is an hour and a half with
eight to ten people. Obviously, this does not include the multifamily group
or drop-in groups, which are often larger than this and are still effective.
CRITERIA FOR MEMBERSHIP
HealthyPlace.com
Audio
Pro-Anorexia Websites
Pro-anorexia web-sites have sprung up on the internet offering tips and
encouragement on being an anorexic. Shannon Bonnette, who runs a US website for
eating disorders and Fenella Lamonski, an eating disorder sufferer join the show
to discuss whether these these pro-anorexia web-sites should
be banned.
Listen with
Real Player.
|
|
|
Having the correct diagnosis should not be the only criterion for
allowing patients admittance to the group.
Group therapy is not appropriate
for many patients. They may not be ready, willing, or capable of sharing
with others or hearing what others have to say. Some patients are too
self-absorbed, deviant, distraught, or impulsive to be able to benefit from
group or be of benefit to anyone else. Some patients simply cannot "be
there" for the others, and putting them in a group would be
counterproductive for everyone.
The group therapist must ultimately decide who will benefit from group
and who will not. An individual interview or screening process is a good
idea. Patients for whom the therapist feels group is appropriate but who are
resistant should be encouraged but not coerced, because the likelihood for
their success in group is minimal.
CAUTIONS AND CONCERNS
The following are common concerns regarding possible occurrences in group
therapy. The therapist must deal with these problems and either make changes
or terminate the group.
Patients getting too many negative ideas from each other. If a
young girl has never heard of drinking ipecac to induce vomiting and learns
this technique in group therapy, she may try the technique out herself,
leaving the group leader or member feeling responsible. Don't let the group
turn into a sharing session of eating disorder techniques. One way to avoid
this problem is to make a rule that specific behaviors, such as purging
techniques, cannot be shared in group. Instruct the group that if someone
wants to discuss an incident in which she vomited ten times, took diuretics,
or went on the
Stairmaster for two hours, she is to use the terms purged or
exercised and is not to give any specifics about the means, the amount, or
any other details.
This way, a patient can get help and support from the group without
giving clues or ideas about purging techniques to other group members. This
also helps others avoid competitive thinking: "I only exercised for one
hour; I need to do more." Although specific details can be useful to explore
in individual therapy, the point of group therapy is to get help on how not
to use vomiting, exercising, or other eating disorder behaviors as a means
of weight control or as a
coping method for dealing with feelings. In a
similar vein, it is wise to ask patients not to discuss actual weights or
the amount of weight they have lost or gained. Avoiding this kind of
discussion will help reduce some of the competition that inevitably happens
in eating disorder groups.
Sometimes groups can become dumping or gripe sessions, where members
complain that recovery is impossible and there is no hope. It is destructive
for a group if a member continues on a litany of horrible things she is
doing or can't stop doing, especially if she's not really asking for or
accepting help or support. Make a rule that no one is allowed to just come
in and "dump." Explain that this does not mean that complaining is not
allowed, but that if someone has a problem or is experiencing pain or
suffering she must not only share this with the group but also must ask for
the group's advice and support.
Having an eating disorder increases patients' self-worth. Although
this is tricky, it is important that patients not receive too many secondary
gains just for having an eating disorder. For some people, the eating
disorder group may be the first place they've ever really felt understood,
supported, or accepted by others. This is true in individual therapy as
well. Although this can have a positive effect, it is important that
patients learn that they can be understood, supported, and accepted for
being who they are, not for having an eating disorder. Some patients
recognize this dilemma and others don't. All patients should be helped to
understand this issue; part of the group agenda can be working through it.
It is important that the group does not have the effect of normalizing or
glamorizing eating disorders. When everyone in the group hates her body or
when everyone purges, it is easy for the behavior to become somewhat
"normalized." It is important that the group facilitator keep this in mind
and somehow discuss this with the group. Furthermore, the amount and kind of
attention that individuals who have eating disorders receive can glamorize
these illnesses. An ironic example of this is an incident in which a movie
director went to an eating disorder group to find actresses for a movie on
eating disorders. One of my patients told me that she and several others in
the group were aspiring actresses looking for movie roles. Later, we spent a
session discussing how conflicted she was that she got her movie break by
having an eating disorder.
Patients get worse or engage in more symptoms to get attention from
each other or the therapist. Competition will always exist in groups on
some level, but it may also get out of control and become highly
unproductive. One member of a group took extra laxatives on learning that
several group members had called another participant during the week after
she had reported taking a similar amount in a previous group. In another
group, two members called me over the weekend. The first just left a message
asking me to call her; the second left a message that she had just taken
ipecac. I only returned the second patient's call. When this came up in
group, the first patient said, "Oh, now I know what I have to do to get you
to call me over the weekend." This is a difficult issue: although it is
important to avoid giving attention only to increased or more severe
symptoms, in some cases this attention is necessary. Therefore it may be
helpful to discuss up front the pros and cons of giving attention
negatively. Some members who continue to inappropriately seek attention in
this manner may need to be asked to leave the group.
Participants feel too much pressure from the other group members and
start to withdraw, lie, or not show up. Well-meaning group members often
become cotherapists of a group to the point of insisting on change or
judging others who don't comply with suggestions. This can be extremely
subtle and should be watched for carefully. Group members feeling judged or
pressured may not attribute it to other group members and may feel it is
their own inadequacy or weakness that is the problem. The group facilitator
must intervene when one or more group members are overly pressuring or
judgmental. The therapist might ask, "Jamie, why is it so hard for you to
accept that Alice may not agree to stop using laxatives?" or "Michelle, you
seem angry that Monica threw up this week. Can you help us understand what
that anger is about?" It is important to remind the group that judging
others is not what the group is about. Every one has her own path toward
recovery and her own reasons for maintaining the illness.
pages
1
2 3
top ~
next ~
send page to a
friend
|