Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a recognized treatment for
severe depression, but it is a potentially dangerous treatment that
can cause short-term memory loss. Thus, ECT should be restricted to
uses in which its efficacy has been clearly demonstrated (e.g.
severe depression.). As with other forms of treatment, the MI
Principles [UN Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental
Illness] require that ECT be limited to patients for whom it is
"appropriate to his or her health needs" and does not
cause unjustified "harm...mental distress or physical
discomfort.
The frequency of ECT use and the modality of treatment varies by
institution. According to institution authorities at Colonia Rossi,
Colonia Etchepare, and Musto, ECT is frequently used to control
"aggressive behavior" in patients who may or may not have
any psychiatric diagnosis. Records reflected this use. At Musto,
where institution authorities report that 10% of the patient
population receives ECT at any one time, ECT is reported to be used
for a wide variety of conditions, including aggressive behavior by
people with mental retardation.
MDRI (Mental Disability Rights International) reviewed the
records of two patients at Musto with mental retardation who had
received extensive ECT, even though they had no psychiatric
diagnosis. In one case, a twenty-seven year old woman with mental
retardation and no psychiatric diagnosis received ECT once a week
for almost one year. There was no explanation in the record as to
what the ECT was supposed to accomplish. The limited narrative in
the record states only that she "is aggressive, she constantly
escapes from home, she walks and screams." There is no
indication that behavioral therapies were used or attempted. The
record states that she had several previous admissions at Vilardebo
Hospital, and she appears to have been kept continuously at Musto
for the last two years.
Authorities reported that bilateral ECT is generally used, a
practice which is no more effective than unilateral ECT and which
has greater risks of memory loss. The ECT inspected by MDRI are
older "sine wave" machines rather than "brief pulse.
Patients are not asked for their consent to take ECT. Where
institutions seek consent, they ask families, not patients, for
approval. Information on ECT's negative side effects is not
provided. (pp.40-41)
top
home | about
me | studies & statistics
| media | official
statements | news
sex, lies, & eegs | brain
| misc. | ect
bulletin board
| send to
friend
|