A Primer on Depression and Bipolar Disorder
II. MOOD DISORDERS AS PHYSICAL ILLNESSES
C. Treatment of Depression and Bipolar Disorder
As has been mentioned several times above, the most effective tools
available for the treatment of
depression and bipolar disorder are
medications (i.e. drugs). Nevertheless, many victims of these illnesses are
often concerned and confused about taking medication, and therefore resist
treatment. From my experience with hundreds of people who have CMI, I have
concluded this resistance originates from two erroneous ideas. First, there
is a confusion of therapeutic psychiatric medication with illegal
psychoactive ``street drugs''. Anyone beginning treatment with psychiatric
medication needs to understand clearly that there is no more connection
between the former and the latter than there is between a Greyhound bus and
a miller moth. The street drugs are chosen because they interfere
with normal operation of the brain and produce abnormal and often bizarre
mental responses. They actually destroy normal brain function, and if
abused in sufficient quantity for sufficient time, can lead to injury or
even death. In contrast, psychiatric medication has been very carefully
chosen, perhaps even ``designed'', to restore normal brain function
to the greatest extent possible. They are very carefully tested for efficacy
and safety. Only after passing a rigorous review procedure are they released
for public use. Subsequent to release, their performance is continuously
monitored as they are used in thousands to millions of doses each year. In
short, one need not have any fear whatsoever that psychiatric medication
will have the same harmful effects as illegal street drugs.
Second, many potential users are fearful that psychiatric medication will
degrade or interfere with their mental abilities. These fears are rarely a
problem for people with deep depression (who basically will do anything
reasonable to gain release from the depression), but often are quite strong
for people who are mildly to moderately manic because those people feel
``good'', and believe that they have superior mental (and sometimes
physical) abilities and performance. These people don't want anyone
tinkering with their ``mind''. They need to be convinced and reassured that
controlling their mania will not degrade their intelligence, insight,
cognitive and learning abilities; I can vouch first-hand for this statement.
What they will lose is speed: the same tasks take a little longer. But those
tasks will typically be done more carefully. It's a tradeoff: one loses the
manic sense of speed and power, but one also is no longer driven
obsessively, scattered by dozens of intrusive ideas and thoughts. And one
loses the sense of isolation that characterizes mania because one is unable
to make meaningful person-to-person contact with those around oneself. For
me, the manic state always produced the sensation of my seeming to be living
in someone else's mind, or someone else living in mine. That is an
unpleasant experience. I am more than happy to sacrifice manic ``facility''
in order to get rid of the other unpleasant, threatening, and destructive
aspects of mania.
I will not go through the catalog of medications here because it has
grown quite large, and excellent and authoritative discussions are easily
available in the books cited in the Bibliography. In broadest terms,
there are three groups of medications used to treat depression: (1) the
tricyclics, (2) the MAO inhibitors, and (3) SSRIs (Selective
Serotonin-Reuptake Inhibitors). The tricyclics were discovered first, and
sometimes remain useful treatment strategies to this day. The MAOIs have
restrictive dietary constraints for their use, and can have troublesome side
effects; but for some people they provide effective relief. The breakthrough
came with the development of the SSRIs. They work by inhibiting the
reuptake of the essential neurotransmitter serotonin from a synapse
between two nerve cells that have just fired, thus leaving it in place for
the next time it is needed. These drugs (e.g. Prozac, Zoloft, Wellbutrin,
Effexor) have proven to be extraordinarily effective in treating depression,
while having only minor side effects. They have the advantage of not
introducing something new to the ``ecology'' of the brain, but merely
inducing the brain to leave one of its own natural ``ingredients'' in place
so that it can be used when next needed.
It must be emphasized that specific person may respond to several of
these drugs, just a few or even just one, or none. The challenge to the
therapist is to discover, as quickly as possible, the drug that works best
for each individual treated. If he/she is skilled (and lucky!), the first
choice may work effectively and quickly. But if it doesn't, it is imperative
to continue to try other possibilities until one is found that works! This
requires strong commitment on the part of both the victim and the physician.
For example, in 1985, I started off with Desyrel, chosen by my doctor
because it was the current ``wonder drug'' and putatively had few side
effects. For me Desyrel was a disaster: it gave me no relief from depression
after months of treatment (typically an antidepressant begins to work within
3 weeks of when it was started), it confused me, it made me uncontrollably
sleepy during the day, and interfered with thinking and cognition. Only
after months of being so ``treated'' did I get effective help from Drs.
Grace and Dubovsky, who switched me to a tricyclic, desipramine. As
described above, within three weeks this different medication broke the
depression. If you are not getting relief after a reasonable time, don't
be shy about talking to your doctor about trying a different medication.
The change might save your life. In 1997, when Desipramine had failed for
me, it was clear what to do: Dr. Johnson immediately phased it out, and
moved me to the SSRI Effexor without a hitch. That has made a world of
difference!
Until recently, the first line of defense against mania was lithium
(carbonate). It was discovered by John Cade in Australia in 1949, but was
not used therapeutically in the U.S. for almost another 20 years. Sometimes
in emergency cases the victim is started off on an antipsychotic drug such
as Thorazine, Mellaril, or Trilafon; these are designed to help the victim
calm down and make closer contact with reality. In cases of extreme mania --
someone totally out of control, needing to be restrained -- the effects of
these antipsychotic drugs are often downright amazing. In the space of a
very few days the victim becomes calm, and fairly normal in terms of overall
behavior. In 1997 this approach, including restraint, was necessary for me.
If lithium fails to control the mania sufficiently, or has undesirable side
effects, the therapist will then try other anti-manic agents such as
Valproic Acid (Depakote), Tegretol, or Klonopin. These days Valproic Acid
has generally become the preferred treatment for mania. It is also
worth mentioning that the effects of anti-manic treatment generally improve
with time. In my own case, for example, I have noticed a definite,
continuous ``ramping up'' in my general sense of well being, and my
objective job performance. At the same time, it has been possible to reduce
by almost half the amount of the medication I originally took. On the other
hand, when lithium failed me, it failed suddenly, and I would have needed
intensive medical supervision to have detected the transition. After I was
moved to Depakote, I felt much better than before; a persistent hand
tremor that I had while taking lithium vanished, and I feel generally
``calm'' all the time. It is a blessing. All of these experiences point to
the fact that it is essential to stay in close contact with your doctor
while being treated for these illnesses; the disease is chronic, and your
fight against it is likely to last a lifetime!
top | continued | table of contents
home | about me |
depression - bipolar disorder
primer
depression and spiritual
growth | send
page to friend | bulletin board
|