interviews
A Conversation
with Michael Lindfield on:
Life, Meaning,
Findhorn, and Transformation

cont. p. 3
Tammie: It
sounds like this perspective has worked very well for you.
Michael Lindfield:
It works well as long as one is clear and listens deeply within.
When I’m not clear and not listening deeply within, it doesn’t
work as well. If it’s not working, I say to myself, "You’re
not listening". So I straighten myself out and do whatever it
takes to be receptive to those subtle signals from inside.
Tammie:
When you mentioned putting Seattle on your luggage and sending it
off, one of the things that strikes me Michael, is that about a year
ago, I started to notice that many of the books I was reading and
appreciating were written by authors living in Seattle. Or I would
hear about, for instance, simplicity circles and Cecil Andrews, and
find out that she was from Seattle. Just over-and-over again, it
appeared to me that a great deal was going on in Seattle. I'm
wondering if you find that to be true, and if it is, how do you
explain what's going on there?
Michael Lindfield:
Well, I told you I came in early ’86, I traveled around the
states. I went to Milwaukee, then to California, then up here to
Washington State. I was offered the job in San Francisco, it was a
nice offer and I thought it would be fun. Then I thought, "no
let’s just put that on the back burner."
I got on the plane to Seattle. When I got off,
looked around, and sniffed the air, it felt so refreshing. It felt
like, "Yeah this is home" - but not just on the physical
level. Physically, it reminded me of Scotland and Scandinavia rolled
into one. So I felt at home on that level. But on an inner level, on
a psychic level - on a deeper level, it felt as though the sky was
clear with very high ceilings: it was uncluttered.
When I was down in L.A. and San Francisco, it
felt busy. Even though a lot of good things were happening, there
was a lot already filled in. There wasn’t much psychic space. When
I came up here to Seattle, it was as though the skies had cleared
and I got this image of the northwest as the seed bed for the new
civilization. We are talking distant future here. The whole Pacific
rim is the magical ring or circle in which this new cultural
expression will emerge.
It’s interesting to note that the
Theosophical teachings mention that for each stage in human
evolution over the grand scale - over vast time periods - each
particular development is focused on a new continent. We’ve had
Atlantis, we've had Europe, and now we have America. Supposedly
another landmass will rise in thousands-and-thousands of years time
called Pacificus and this will usher in the era of intuitive peace
and alignment to divine intent. And so I have a sense that this ring
of fire that we call the Pacific ring, or the Pacific Rim, is the
magic circle in which the preparatory work is taking place for
what’s to come. That's the deep sense I have of this place.
Tammie: I
remember visiting Seattle and within an hour thinking, "this is
an incredible place," and being very much drawn to it and
feeling that this is a place where I would want to be.
Michael Lindfield:
Yes, especially the Islands - the San Juan Islands - a short ferry
ride from Seattle. In half-an-hour, you can be in another world –
they are absolutely magical. It's as though, here in this part of
the world, we really do have a seedbed for new ideas. Things are
possible here. And also, I've found that there's a great sense of
connection and support among people here. People really help each
other out. And I am absolutely thrilled with the depth of
relationship that I have established here – both socially and
professionally in the academic and business circles. I know that
good people exist everywhere on the planet, and yet, there is
something happening here that I feel drawn to. People are being
called to build something here, just as they are being called to
build everywhere, but there's a certain quality here that I resonate
to. I guess I’m saying that this is the right place for me. Now,
that might change a year from now, or even two or three years from
now. Who knows?
Tammie:
But at this point in time…
Michael Lindfield:
At this point in time there is a "rightness" about it.
Tammie:
Well that's helpful for me, because I've said before, "I can't
explain it, I just think there's something very special about
Seattle." To which I usually received blank stares. Moving on
to the next question, you've written that perhaps we ,in the Western
world, have been looking in the wrong places and using inappropriate
tools in our search for truth. I was hoping that you would elaborate
on that.
Michael Lindfield:
I believe, that in the West, we have worked to hone and perfect the
analytical mind and in our scientific research into the meaning of
life, we've been looking mostly at objects. What we haven't really
paid attention to is the relationship between these objects. We see
that as empty space. The prevailing world-view is that there's just
empty space populated by objects.
What I believe is that space is a living
field. Space is an entity in its own right that, through its
energetic field, makes conscious relationship possible. It is what I
would call a "vibrant field of conscious connection"
because it allows a relationship between the objects to exist. It is
a "thing" in its own right, but it's not a particularized
thing, it's more like a wave than a particle. You have to have both
waves and particles to have the whole picture. And I think we've
just been looking at the particles and trying to put the particles
together, and not realizing that there is no such thing as empty
space.
Everything is a dynamic field of
consciousness, and the only thing that we really have is
relationship. We have the relationship with our own inner self, we
have the relationship with others and we have the relationship with
other life forms. So our experience of life is built on a series of
simultaneous relationships. This is what gives coherency and meaning
to life. Without relationships there would be no connection. Without
connection, there is no meaning.
When I look outside my window right now, I see
the sky and the clouds rolling in. In the middle distance, I see fir
trees. So, as I now look at the sky and the fir trees together,
there is also a quality and a living presence which can only be
described as sky/tree. It isn't an empty space between sky and tree.
It is in fact a consciousness, a relationship. The words don't
really describe it properly. I don't think we have the words for
that which we don't yet recognize. So that's one aspect of it.
The other aspect is - and I don't want to
generalize too much - but I know that in the west we've always had
this image of "the quest". The story says that one day I
will reach the Promised Land, but I'll have to go through terrible
terrain to get there, meet the monsters and all of that. And on one
level that is very true, but what this image does is to create a
mental model, or mind-set that says, "Today I am nothing. I am
here, and over there is everything". This way of thinking
creates a huge gap between here and there, between me and the
fulfillment of myself. And then I look with more of a Zen Buddhist
approach or an Eastern approach where the image is that life already
is. We are already here – it is all around us.
The journey isn’t one of distance – it is
one of consciousness. Just be still and be part of it. Where the
only thing that is stopping you from being part of it, is your
ability to stop and be part of it. It's a different way. So, in the
same way that we have used the phrase "poverty
consciousness" associated with an ability to acquire material
things, I believe we have a poverty of spiritual possibilities in
our western image of life.
We talked about that several years ago around
manifesting money. The conversation was about how we each set our
own ceiling and our own limits of what we're willing and able to
create and generate. Well, I think there are echoes of that in the
mental models that we use for spiritual wholeness or spiritual
enlightenment. And it has to do with; "I don't have it, one day
I'll get it." The other is, "It is here, I am already it.
Can I allow myself to resonate with that and be it fully? Can I work
from the inside out?" So I guess that's what it is, it's the
difference between working from the inside out and acknowledging I
already am in essence but not yet in manifestation.
It’s tough to stay in that space all the
time. Sometimes I revert to the other mind-set where I am nothing
and I feel the need to add to myself and appropriate cultural
trappings and religious labels in order to be able to stand up and
say, "this is who I am." I believe the gap has closed
somewhat within the last ten years because of the influence of the
eastern philosophies and their attendant practices that are now more
prevalent in the west. However, I do believe that we still have a
tendency in this particular culture - the American-European culture
- to look at things as distant and to look at objects as separate.
That’s what I was getting at. So it's our way of perceiving and
understanding how life moves through us and how we move through
life.
It’s the same thing that I mentioned before.
If I truly believe that I'm only on earth for a limited number of
years followed by death, oblivion and darkness, my possibilities in
life are conditioned by these beliefs. It is very different from
another culture that says, "If I do good now, I'll come back
better and so I'm willing to sacrifice myself and lay my body on the
line". Not that the world-view of "one life and you’re
out" is necessarily wrong – I’m saying that it can be
limiting – it can cramp your spiritual style. Fear of death can
cramp anyone’s style!
top | continued
| pages 1 2
3 4 5
6 7
| interviews index
home | birthquake
| about me | sageplace
vision | words of wisdom
chief seattle | life
letters | psychotherapy | essays
| thoughts | interviews
where have the frogs
gone | chat schedule | books
| send
page |
|