interviews
Anthony Spina: On
'Voluntary Simplicity' and 'Intentional Conscious Living'
Anthony C. Spina, Ph.D. has over 25 years
business, industry, and education experience in both internal and external
consulting. He has broad professional experience in multiple disciplines, such
as organizational effectiveness, research, market analysis, training, change
management, information technology, and marketing.
He is the founder and president of Knowledge Resources,
an organization focused on facilitating transitioning processes for both
individuals and organizations attempting to meet the challenges and demands of
constantly changing, complex environments. Dr. Spina considers himself a social
critic and management philosopher passionately concerned about the societal
impact of technology on the way we live and work.

Tammie: What
attracted you personally to the voluntary simplicity movement?
Dr. Spina:
Approximately fifteen years ago, I started to become very much aware of my
lifestyle and of those around me (friends, neighbors, relatives, co-workers,
etc). I continually heard and witnessed how hectic everyone's lives were and
how they wanted to get out of the rat race. Compared to living conditions 30-40
years ago, there appeared to be a paradox. We have the most labor saving
devices now in society than ever before in history. In the 1980's, all the
business journals reported that the problem of the 90's was going to be how to
fill up all our leisure time. They predicted a 35-hour work week and that the
fastest growing industry would be the leisure marketplace. Needless to say
something quite different is in place.
More recently, I stumbled upon the simplicity movement
while performing the literature review for my dissertation. Actually, I
discovered it during the concept stage and delved deeper into the phenomenon in
the initial stages of my research. I was looking into the literature associated
with quality of life issues and happiness. The volume of information was
sufficient for several lifetimes of research. The topic of simplicity stirred
up great curiosity in me and I decided to seek out the potential relationship
between this trend and what I was observing in my everyday life. That's when I
began reading more of the publications associated with simplicity and my
interest grew exponentially into the meaning and processes behind this
trend.
Tammie: You indicated
in your wonderful article, "Research Shows New Aspects of Voluntary
Simplicity" that in all the cases that you studied of individuals who
"downshifted" or made significant moves to simplify their lives,
there existed a "wake up" call or a triggering event. Were there
common themes related to the kinds of events or realizations that served as an
impetus for change in the people that you studied? And if so, what were they?
Dr. Spina: Bare in
mind that my research was qualitative. If perhaps, I had performed a
quantitative study and surveyed thousands of people, then maybe I would have
seen a pattern. However, in my research, there were no common, easily
identified "triggers." Each was very unique and common to the
individual's situation and circumstances. These included events such as
divorce, witnessing a tragic event, a vacation in the wilderness, or job loss,
to name a few. But we all experience these events in our lives and yet the
majority of us do not make major transitions. The "trigger" alone is
not enough. The stage has to be set to allow the individual to hear the
"signal" when the trigger is fired and take us above the
"noise" level.
Tammie: What,
specifically, are you referring to when you talk about the "noise"
level?
Dr. Spina: The word
"noise" was inspired and borrowed from the field of Communication and
Information Theory. In layman's terms, recall the time before cable when you
had to adjust the rabbit ears on top of your TV to tune in the station, thus
resulting in a clear picture and sound. The snow and static, where the
"noise" and the picture & sound represented the message which
contained information. The greater the noise, the weaker the signal. When the
message is unintelligible, information is not transmitted and all meaning is
lost.
Using this metaphor to amplify (no pun intended) my
research findings, the meaning(s) in our daily living is often drowned out by
the noise we experience. This "noise," enabled by many of our modern
technologies, takes the form of over-work, the glut of information,
consumerism/materialism, mass advertising, and the TV & personal computers.
Included in this last category are the cell phones, beepers, laptops, pagers,
FAX machines, etc. which blur the line between our work space and personal
lives. The signal must emerge from all this noise and can only occur if one is
ready and pre-disposed to begin adjusting the "rabbit ears" (I
couldn't resist) of our lives to make it happen.
Tammie: Thanks.
That's a terrific analogy. You also reported that each participant in your
study appeared to experience a process that involved three stages: (1)
Pre-transition, (2) Trigger or motivation, and (3) Post-Transition. Would you
mind elaborating on these stages just a bit?
Dr. Spina: The
pre-transition state is what I observed as a set of conditions or circumstances
which had significantly deteriorated the quality of living. It's an awareness
state. "I know something is wrong. I am not finding my present life
situation to be meaningful, enjoyable, or worthy of being sustained. I am not
sure what it is I am searching for, but this isn't it anymore." This is
typically the state of mind of one in this pre-transition state. Once again,
many of us feel this way from time to time, but when it becomes sustained and
there is this mental affirmation that it just won't do anymore. the stage is
set. The "noise" level in our lives has become saturated. All that is
needed is something to tip the scales, which leads to the next stage.
The trigger or motivation stage is what caused these
individuals to reclaim meaning in their lives. It can be what we typically
refer to as the "last straw," but more likely, it's something totally
more remote. For example, one of my research participants recalled being on a
vacation trip which involved a day long kayak trip in which they were only able
to take along the bare essentials for life. This event raised their awareness
of the excesses in their normal lives. Now this doesn't appear on the surface
to be such a mind-blowing event, but coupled with their existing quality of
life, this is all it took to send them into the next stage.
Once the participant recognized what is truly important
in their lives, the source of noise is easily identified and minimized as
necessary. This is what I referred to as the post-transition stage. Here is
where the signal or meaning levels are turned up high and the person is now
pursuing the lifestyle that was absent from his or her daily living previously.
It may involve a geographic move, a divorce, a change of jobs, or all of the
above. The most revealing observation I made was that this new direction was
really not new at all. It was what these people were all about since their
youth, but over the years, the noise, often assisted by our high-tech society,
dimmed out.
Tammie: You've
explored how technology has served as a trigger or motivator in leading some
people to downshift and you offer a very important perspective that I'm hoping
you might share.
Dr. Spina: When I
began my research, I was seeking a connection between this movement and
technology, particularly, information-related technologies. I admitted that my
researcher bias was looking to indict technology as the negative motivator.
My first observation was quite the contrary. Several
downshifters use technology to help simplify. The most obvious example is using
the computer to tele-work or tele-commute, thus working from home, either full
or part-time. This allows for more flexible scheduling in one's life and a
better balance between work and family. This, of course, assumes the nature of
your passion and work allow for this arrangement. Others use email to connect
with distance friends and family, as well as other simplicity advocates forming
online communities of interest. Personally, having been a technocrat most of my
life, I prefer face-to-face encounters over the electronic ones. Yet, look at
what's facilitating this dialogue right now and witness the audience that may
be exposed to this discussion.
Tammie: You pointed
out that the Kellogg company reduced work hours to six hours a day during the
depression in order to preserve jobs, and as a result the quality of life for
these workers improved significantly. There have been a number of studies it
seems that indicate that there's a very definite relationship between fewer
work hours and quality of life and yet for the most part, most Americans just
keep working longer and harder these days it seems. Why is that from your
perspective?
Dr. Spina: Work was
identified as one of the greatest examples of "noise." The
work-spend-consume-work- spend-consume cycle is ruling the majority of American
society. For many, who we are is defined by what we do and what we have. We
have a multiplicity of identities. Kenneth Gergen, in his book, The
Saturated Self, calls this "multiphrenia." If we need to identify
ourselves externally, we will easily sink into the noise levels. In order to
buy all those nice accoutrements, we will need to work more to obtain the money
to pay for those purchases. The market will gladly accommodate this desire.
Advertising and its associated media target just this situation and we respond.
Members of the Voluntary Simplicity (VS) movement
transition from an externally identified self to an internally identified self.
This is where all the meaning, the signal, resides. It takes courage to do
this, because by placing less emphasis on material possessions, one has to
identify one's self by what's inside. How many know what that is, since we have
been brainwashed to rely on external things for this answer? For those, the
majority, who have not come to this realization, they will have to continue to
define themselves externally. This means more money, which in turn means more
work.
There are many other factors that contribute to overwork,
related to economics, globalization, advances in technology, the transforming
to a service economy, single parent families, etc. All the people in my
research were affected by these conditions as well. Therefore, I have offered
my opinion from a more micro level.
Tammie: Your
definition of simplicity, "living life to its fullest (by each person's
own standards) without harm to the planet or the society," is a wonderful
one. How have you applied this definition to your own life?
Dr. Spina: I struggle
with this daily. Personally, I have been through the first and second stages of
VS, or what I am now calling Intentional Conscious Living (ICL). Almost four
years ago, I left my corporate career for more meaningful work. I watch my
purchases of material things much more closely than ever before and have become
more environmentally aware. I no longer rely on external appearances for my
identity, for who "I am." The other members of my family are not
necessarily in concert with my new found direction. That has caused conflict
and limits on how fast and how deep I can move in the direction of
simplification. So I am still executing the third stage of post-transition
quality of life. I am certain the path is correct, but uncertain of the
challenges ahead. Nevertheless, the "signal" is strong and the
meaning is becoming more clear daily. The dependence on money (more than is
really necessary) is the most difficult challenge in the face of mortgages,
college tuition, etc. All of these can be overcome as is evidenced in the
simplicity literature.
Tammie: You've also
asserted that perhaps we need a new defining term to describe what we're
currently referring to as "the simple living movement" and you've
suggested "intentional conscious Living" as an alternative. How might
"intentional conscious living" more accurately define this movement?
Dr. Spina: I believe
that if VS'ers truly wish to share the experience, meaning, and satisfaction of
their newly-found quality of life, the focus should not be on frugality alone
or being a tightwad. What I said before, is that many people define themselves
by what "they have" and "how they look." If you were to
appeal to these folks and encourage them to give these possessions up, you are
in reality asking them to give up part of themselves. ICL is not giving up
anything. It's getting something back that has been lost. This is the message
that needs to be conveyed. Now it may involve, less spending, more
environmental awareness, different purchasing options, but this should be an
effect not the inspiration for the transition.
When I approach people with the term simplicity, they
respond with fear and apprehension. They tell me, "I like spending money
and will work hard to get it. I enjoy a day at the mall. I like to have nice
things." It is not for me to judge these people as being uninformed or
unenlightened. However, if these same people tell me they are unhappy, hate
their work, need more time, feel stressed, have little energy for
relationships, and wish things were simpler; then they need to live a life that
is more mindful, more conscious, more intentional. This is the first message
they should hear, not start downsizing!
Tammie: That's a
really important point that you've made, and I agree with you. Tom Bender once
wrote when addressing the tendency of so many Americans towards overconsumption
that, "after awhile more becomes a heavy load." I'm wondering how you
would respond to Bender's statement.
Dr. Spina: I think I
may have already answered this question. The more toys we have the more
attention and maintenance they require, not to mention more time for the
additional work needed to earn the additional money to buy "more." So
the burden of "more" is hidden in the process to acquire
"more." It is a process that is enabled by technology in the form of
television and new media advertising. It's what keeps the economy going. It's
the whole consumption issue and why it's in place.
Tammie: What advice
would you offer someone who's seriously considering simplifying his or her
Life?
Dr. Spina: The
participants in my study all took their cue from reading two books,
"Voluntary Simplicity", by Duane Elgin; and, "Your Money or Your
Life", by Joe Dominquez and Vicki Robin. These two works seem to represent
the bible of the VS movement. I would also highly recommend that they attend a
Simplicity Study Circle or begin one themselves. I recommend the latter and
encourage them to read Cecile Andrew's book, "The Circle of
Simplicity."
The reason to start one from scratch is based on the
original intent of study circles. That is, people coming together to solve a
common problem. Then, if downsizing is the goal, the more common themes of VS
can be explored. If the issues are focused on more meaningful and conscious
living, the group might start on a different footing. This will insure that
folks won't be scared away by thinking they have to give up their homes to
enjoy life. I also encourage people to "talk it up." You will be
surprised to find out how many of us feel the same way but are apprehensive to
speak up because we thing we are alone with these thoughts.

You can read Dr. Spina's article, "Research Shows
New Aspects of Voluntary Simplicity" in the January-March 1999 issue of
the Simple Living Network Newsletter. All correspondence can be directed to Dr.
Spina at Knowledge Resources, 19 Norman Lane, Succasunna, NJ 07876 E-Mail:
drspina@usa.net
top |
next |
table of contents
home | birthquake | about me
| sageplace vision | words of wisdom
chief seattle |
life letters | psychotherapy | essays |
thoughts | interviews
where have the frogs gone |
chat schedule | books |
send page |
|