|

continued
So far, researchers have only been able to focus on that first criteria -
trying to define the constellation of symptoms that constitutes a computer or
internet addiction. Psychologist Kimberly S. Young at the Center for On-Line
Addiction (see the links at the end of this article) classifies people as
Internet-dependent if they meet during the past year four or more of the
criteria listed below. Of course, she is focusing specifically on internet
addiction, and not the broader category of computer addiction:
- Do you feel preoccupied with the Internet or on-line services and think
about it while off line?
- Do you feel a need to spend more and more time on line to achieve
satisfaction?
- Are you unable to control your on-line use?
- Do you feel restless or irritable when attempting to cut down or stop your
on-line use?
- Do you go on line to escape problems or relieve feelings such as
helplessness, guilt, anxiety or depression?
- Do you lie to family members or friends to conceal how often and how long
you stay online?
- Do you risk the loss of a significant relationship, job, or educational or
career opportunity because of your on-line use?
- Do you keep returning even after spending too much money on on-line fees?
- Do you go through withdrawal when off line, such as increased depression,
moodiness, or irritability?
- Do you stay on line longer than originally intended?
In what he intended as a joke, Ivan Goldberg proposed his own set of
symptoms for what he called "Pathological Computer Use". Other psychologists are debating other possible symptoms of internet
addiction, or symptoms that vary slightly from Young's criteria and Goldberg's
parody of such criteria. These symptoms include:
- drastic lifestyle changes in order to spend more time on the net
- general decrease in physical activity
- a disregard for one's health as a result of internet activity
- avoiding important life activities in order to spend time on the net
- sleep deprivation or a change in sleep patterns in order to spend time on
the net
- a decrease in socializing, resulting in loss of friends
- neglecting family and friends
- refusing to spend any extended time off the net
- a craving for more time at the computer
- neglecting job and personal obligations
On a
listserv devoted to the cyberpsychology, Lynne Roberts
(robertsl@psychology.curtin.edu.au) described some of the possible physiological
correlates of heavy internet usage, although she didn't necessarily equate these
reactions with pathological addiction:
- A conditioned response (increased pulse, blood pressure) to the modem
connecting
- An "altered state of consciousness" during long periods of dyad/small group
interaction (total focus and concentration on the screen, similar to a
mediation/trance state).
- Dreams that appeared in scrolling text (the equivalent of MOOing).
- Extreme irritability when interrupted by people/things in "real life" while
immersed in c-space.
In my own article on "addictions" to the Palace, a graphical
MOO/chat environment, I cited the criteria that psychologists often use in
defining ANY type of addiction. It's clear that the attempts to define computer
and internet addiction draw on these patterns that are perhaps common to
addictions of all types - patterns that perhaps point to deeper, universal
causes of addiction:
- Are you neglecting important things in your life because of this behavior?
- Is this behavior disrupting your relationships with important people in your
life?
- Do important people in your life get annoyed or disappointed with you about
this behavior?
- Do you get defensive or irritable when people criticize this behavior?
- Do you ever feel guilty or anxious about what you are doing?
- Have you ever found yourself being secretive about or trying to "cover up"
this behavior?
- Have you ever tried to cut down, but were unable to?
- If you were honest with yourself, do you feel there is another hidden need
that drives this behavior?
If you're getting a bit
confused or overwhelmed by all these criteria, that's understandable. This is
precisely the dilemma faced by psychologists in the painstaking process of
defining and validating a new diagnostic category. On the lighter side, consider
some of the more humorous attempts to define internet addiction. Below is one
list from The World Headquarters of Netaholics Anonymous (http://www.safari.net/~pam/netanon).
Although this is intended as humor, note the striking similarity of some of the
items to the serious diagnostic criteria... There is a kernel of truth even in a
joke:
Top 10 Signs You're Addicted to the Net
-
You wake up at 3 a.m. to go to the bathroom and stop and check your
e-mail on the way back to bed.
- You get a tattoo that reads "This body best viewed with Netscape Navigator
1.1 or higher."
- You name your children Eudora, Mozilla and Dotcom.
- You turn off your modem and get this awful empty feeling, like you just
pulled the plug on a loved one.
- You spend half of the plane trip with your laptop on your lap...and your
child in the overhead compartment.
- You decide to stay in college for an additional year or two, just for the
free Internet access.
- You laugh at people with 2400-baud modems.
- You start using smileys in your snail mail.
- The last mate you picked up was a JPEG.
- Your hard drive crashes. You haven't logged in for two hours. You start to
twitch. You pick up the phone and manually dial your ISP's access number. You
try to hum to communicate with the modem.
You succeed.
There's also the intriguing
epistemological dilemma concerning the researchers who study cyberspace
addictions. Are they addicted too? If they indeed are a bit preoccupied with
their computers, does this make them less capable of being objective, and
therefore less accurate in their conclusions? Or does their involvement give
them valuable insights, as in participant observation
research? There's no simple answer to these questions.
top | next
home
| about us
| articles
| tests
| cyberwidows
| virtual clinic
| resources
books |
send page
|